2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4742375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic homotopy and landscape dynamical set topology in quantum control

Abstract: We examine the topology of the subset of controls taking a given initial state to a given final state in quantum control, where "state" may mean a pure state |ψ , an ensemble density matrix ρ, or a unitary propagator U (0, T ). The analysis consists in showing that the endpoint map acting on control space is a Hurewicz fibration for a large class of affine control systems with vector controls.Exploiting the resulting fibration sequence and the long exact sequence of basepoint-preserving homotopy classes of map… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The key property for studying the topology of horizontal path spaces is the homotopy lifting property for the endpoint map. Our first result generalizes the main results from [12,21], proving that there exists p c > 1 (depending on F ) such that endpoint map is a Hurewicz fibration for the W 1,p topology for all 1 ≤ p < p c (i.e. F has the homotopy lifting property with respect to any space for these topologies).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key property for studying the topology of horizontal path spaces is the homotopy lifting property for the endpoint map. Our first result generalizes the main results from [12,21], proving that there exists p c > 1 (depending on F ) such that endpoint map is a Hurewicz fibration for the W 1,p topology for all 1 ≤ p < p c (i.e. F has the homotopy lifting property with respect to any space for these topologies).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our proof of the previous theorem is much inspired from [21,12] and in fact consists in a simple (but important) modification of the proof from [21]. This theorem has two immediate consequences for the W 1,p topology (1 < p < p c ): (i) all the spaces Ω(y) as y varies on M are homotopy equivalent; (ii) the inclusion of Ω(y) into the ordinary space of curves (with no nonholonomic constraints) is a weak homotopy equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 22. First of all observe that, since by assumption c α > 0 and (M, ∆) is contact, then every γ ∈ g −1 (c α ) is regular in the sense of (12). Note also that condition (18) in Proposition 15 is equivalent to ∇g = 0.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Remark 1. The uniform convergence topology on Ω has been studied in [25] and the W 1,1 in [12]. The W 1,p topology with p > 1 has been investigated by the first author and F. Boarotto in [8] -for the scopes of calculus of variations the case p > 1 is especially interesting as one can apply classical techniques from critical point theory to many problems of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1. The study of the space of maps with some restrictions on their differential goes back to the works on immersions of S. Smale [16]; the case of trajectories of affine control systems were studied first by A. V. Sarychev [14] for the uniform convergence topology, by J. Dominy and H. Rabitz [10] for the W 1,1 topology and by the last two authors of this paper for the W 1,p , p > 1 topology [3]. The case of closed W 1,2 curves on nonholonomic distribution has been addressed by the last author and A. Mondino on [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%