2022 30th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2022
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco55093.2022.9909609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Graph Topology Learning with Non-Convex Penalties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution to this problem is using sparse penalties, such as the minimax concave penalty (MCP) [13] and the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) [14], that are capable of intelligently distinguishing between active and inactive coefficients. Although these penalties encourage sparse solutions, they mitigate the bias effect of the l 1 -penalty [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution to this problem is using sparse penalties, such as the minimax concave penalty (MCP) [13] and the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) [14], that are capable of intelligently distinguishing between active and inactive coefficients. Although these penalties encourage sparse solutions, they mitigate the bias effect of the l 1 -penalty [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While non-convex and non-smooth penalties may improve estimation accuracy in many problems [24,25], because of their non-convexity and non-smoothness, they complicate optimization. For penalized robust penalized phase retrieval, in particular, proposing an optimization algorithm is more challenging due to its non-convex and non-smooth nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%