2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2003.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic froth stability in froth flotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are concentration at half of the maximum foam height (CMH) [52] determined from the foam height-concentration curve; foam time of life [17]; concentration at minimum bubble velocity (CMV) [43,53] based on the bubble velocity-concentration curve, dynamic stability factor (DSF) [54], Bikerman's foaminess unit Σ(reference) and Sun's frothability index [50]. …”
Section: Other Parameters Used For Frother Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are concentration at half of the maximum foam height (CMH) [52] determined from the foam height-concentration curve; foam time of life [17]; concentration at minimum bubble velocity (CMV) [43,53] based on the bubble velocity-concentration curve, dynamic stability factor (DSF) [54], Bikerman's foaminess unit Σ(reference) and Sun's frothability index [50]. …”
Section: Other Parameters Used For Frother Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we measured the dynamic froth stability as it also plays an important role in flotation (Neethling and Cilliers, 2003;Barbian et al, 2003Barbian et al, , 2005. Figure 10 shows that at a given concentration, MCHM gave more stable froth than MIBC regardless of water quality.…”
Section: Froth Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The froth stability was measured using a modified Bikerman test method (Barbian et al, 2003). The experimental conditions were kept same as those of the coal flotation tests for coal B except that a rectangular transparent column (112 × 110 × 250 mm) was mounted on top of the flotation cell to prevent froth overflowing.…”
Section: Froth Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flotasyon sonrası elde edilen ürünlerin kül analizi için de numuneler agat havan yardımıyla analiz boyutuna kadar öğütüldükten sonra seramik krozeler içerisinde fırında yakılmış ve kalan miktar külün hesaplanmasında kullanılmıştır. Flotasyon deneylerinin yanabilir verimlerini hesaplamak için ise aşağıdaki formül kullanılmıştır: Köpük stabilitesi "Dinamik Köpük Stabilitesi" (DKS) değeri ise aşağıdaki formül ile hesaplanmıştır (Johansson and Pugh 1992;Paulson and Pugh 1996;Gourram-Badri et al 1997;Barbian et al 2003):…”
Section: Flotasyon Deneyleriunclassified