2016 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/epec.2016.7771694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic frequency support with DFIG wind turbines — A system study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the current sources of the detailed WT models depend on the state variables of the differential equations at each time step, the current sources of the simplified WT models at each time step are calculated using the terminal voltages of the last time step (see 14,15,22), which are obtained from (24). The resulting current sources are used to obtain the terminal voltages at the current time step, which serve as input variables of the WT model structures, as illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Norton Equivalent Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the current sources of the detailed WT models depend on the state variables of the differential equations at each time step, the current sources of the simplified WT models at each time step are calculated using the terminal voltages of the last time step (see 14,15,22), which are obtained from (24). The resulting current sources are used to obtain the terminal voltages at the current time step, which serve as input variables of the WT model structures, as illustrated in Figs.…”
Section: Norton Equivalent Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency stability studies are traditionally conducted using RMS simulations, which are capable of simulating much longer events and much larger grid areas compared to EMT simulations [14,[18][19][20]. The RMS wind turbine (WT) models used in frequency stability studies, which are designed based on fundamental machine and converter equations and are also known as quasi-stationary models in the literature, require smaller simulation time steps compared to the conventional active devices (i.e., synchronous generators and dynamic loads) due to comparatively smaller time constants of the converter controllers [6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower wind speeds, power output can be produced by VSSG, but it is not stable and feasible compared to DPSG when it comes to voltage fluctuations [22]. Ref [15] analysed an IEEE 39-Bus system with DFIG based WT as an opportunity to provide support to synthetic inertia and primary frequency control which is known as active power functionalities. Compared to an original system, the frequency behaviour was not favourable with a penetrated system of 50% by standard WPP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, an IEEE 9-Bus system consists of 3 loads, 3 transformers, 3 SGs, 6 transmission lines, and 9 buses where all connections are made at their respective phases. Researchers made use of prominent platforms such as MATLAB/ Simulink[4,14], DIgSILENT PowerFactory by DIgSILENT Simulation Language (DSL)[15], and ETAP[10] to construct the IEEE system and carry simulation. Again, based on familiarisation and simplicity, the MATLAB/ Simulink R2019a will be used as the simulation platform throughout the entire research.In this research, a series of simulations will be carried out where the network will be investigated with three-phase fault implementation at different transmission line locations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%