2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic frequency connectedness between oil and natural gas volatilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the global financial crisis (GFC), a growing number of studies are conducted to explore the connectedness between crude oil and commodity markets, and their methods can be broadly classified into several categories: VAR or structural VAR (SVAR) (Wang et al, 2014;de Nicola et al, 2016); GARCH models (Ji and Fan, 2012;Ewing and Malik, 2013;Jiang et al, 2019); Copula models (Koirala et al, 2015); nonparametric causality analysis (Nazlioglu et al, 2013); vector error correction model (VECM); Markov regime switching (MRS) models (Uddin et al, 2018); and forecast error variance decomposition (FEVD) (Diebold et al, 2017;Lovcha and Perez-Laborda, 2020). However, the previous literature generally underestimates connectedness among commodity markets of a particular class or group, while there are few studies focusing on the oil-commodity nexus at the industry level.…”
Section: Volatility Spillover Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the global financial crisis (GFC), a growing number of studies are conducted to explore the connectedness between crude oil and commodity markets, and their methods can be broadly classified into several categories: VAR or structural VAR (SVAR) (Wang et al, 2014;de Nicola et al, 2016); GARCH models (Ji and Fan, 2012;Ewing and Malik, 2013;Jiang et al, 2019); Copula models (Koirala et al, 2015); nonparametric causality analysis (Nazlioglu et al, 2013); vector error correction model (VECM); Markov regime switching (MRS) models (Uddin et al, 2018); and forecast error variance decomposition (FEVD) (Diebold et al, 2017;Lovcha and Perez-Laborda, 2020). However, the previous literature generally underestimates connectedness among commodity markets of a particular class or group, while there are few studies focusing on the oil-commodity nexus at the industry level.…”
Section: Volatility Spillover Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the forecast horizon H is not as important as the GFEVD implemented here, which is unconditional. Because the static results of the GFEVD framework over the entire sampling period may smooth out the results when the relationship between the variables changes over time (Lovcha and Perez-Laborda, 2020), this paper considers both the static and dynamic spillover effects to obtain more comprehensive estimations. For the dynamics of spillover effects, we employ the moving-window method to analyze the DY12 and BK18.…”
Section: Dynamic Spillovers Between Crude Oil Prices and China's Bulkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many recent studies have used this method to study spillover effects and connectedness between assets, such as Singh et al [19], Kang and Lee [20], and Malik and Umar [21]. In a more recent study, Lovcha and Perez-Laborda [22] used the Diebold-Yilmaz approach and the Barunik and Krehlik methodology to analyze the volatility connectedness between Henry Hub natural gas and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil in the time and frequency domains. Lau et al [23] used the E-GARCH model and the Barunik and Krehlik methodology approach to investigate the return and volatility spillover effects among white precious metals, gold, oil, and global equity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%