2022
DOI: 10.3846/transport.2022.18292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Finite Element Simulation of Wheel–rail Contact Response for the Curved Track Case

Abstract: The wheel–rail interaction will be intensified on account of the complexity of the wheel–rail contact geometry on a curved track. It also may become more complicated and/or have significant difference as the train speed increases, since the dynamic effects cannot be ignored then. In this study, based on explicit Finite Element (FE) software LS-DYNA 971, a Three-Dimensional (3D) elastic-plastic FE model was built to simulate the dynamic wheel–rail contact behaviour of curve negotiating, where the superelevation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the whole vehicle's side-impact test MDB50 involves solving a partial differential equation problem with unknown boundary conditions. This is a typical dynamic contact problem [23], [24], as illustrated in the simplified model shown in Figure 9. In the context of the whole vehicle side-impact collision, the collision motion between the movable barrier and the test vehicle follows the principle of energy conservation.…”
Section: B Verification Of Contact Time Delay Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the whole vehicle's side-impact test MDB50 involves solving a partial differential equation problem with unknown boundary conditions. This is a typical dynamic contact problem [23], [24], as illustrated in the simplified model shown in Figure 9. In the context of the whole vehicle side-impact collision, the collision motion between the movable barrier and the test vehicle follows the principle of energy conservation.…”
Section: B Verification Of Contact Time Delay Issuementioning
confidence: 99%