1998
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1996.0136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Finite Element Model Updating Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These heuristic stochastic search techniques seem to be a promising alternative to traditional approaches. The SA and GA methods have been implemented to accurately describe the dynamic behavior of structures (Levin and Lieven (1998)). Cunha et al (1999) used GAs to identify the elastic constants of composite materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These heuristic stochastic search techniques seem to be a promising alternative to traditional approaches. The SA and GA methods have been implemented to accurately describe the dynamic behavior of structures (Levin and Lieven (1998)). Cunha et al (1999) used GAs to identify the elastic constants of composite materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are part of GOAs, which deal with mechanisms inspired by biological evolution such as cross over, mutation and selection. In the context of model updating and damage detection, several studies have been conducted using different objective functions with GOAs such as genetic algorithm (GA) [15][16][17][18], simulated annealing (SA) [19] and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [20]. GA was applied to a simulated beam, as well as a frame structure using frequencies and MAC-based objective functions to efficiently detect damage [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multiobjective multicriteria GA was studied for damage detection and estimation using MAC and flexibility-related objective functions [18]. A numerical beam and wing plate experimental structure was also investigated using both GA and SA with the frequency response function (FRF)-based objective function [19], and a new bended SA algorithm was also proposed for improvement of the results. Damage detection in thin plates based on modal data using a PSO-GA-based approach has been presented by Vaez and Fallah [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two approaches used in finite-element-model updating: direct methods and iterative methods. 26 Direct methods, which use the modal properties, are computationally efficient to implement and reproduce the measured modal data exactly, but they do not take into account the physical parameters that are updated. Iterative procedures use changes in physical parameters to update the finite element models and, thereby, generate models that are physically realistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Among iterative procedures, many stochastic optimization methods have been used in model updating and damage detection. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Levin and Lieven 26 introduced the genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing for finite-element-model updating. Marwala [34][35][36] successfully applied three separate genetic algorithms to minimize the distance between the measured data and the finite-element predicted data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%