2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic evolution of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins in Holozoa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we are unaware of any existing quantitative approach that identifies the evolutionary pressures behind the highly variable patterns of the presence and absence of mtDNA genes across the whole of the eukaryotic tree of life. Although important progress has been made at a sequence level, Scheel and Hausdorf (2014) take a phylogenetic approach in studying the sequence evolution of mitochondrial ribosomes across a diverse range of taxa), molecular phylogenies are not necessarily the optimal tools to answer broader questions about the evolution of genome structure (Keeling et al, 2005), particularly given the broad range of taxa (and consequent differences in encodings and sequence properties), and the possible parallel evolutionary pathways involved (Adams et al, 2002;Maier et al, 2013). To make progress with this evolutionary problem, we developed highly generalizable stochastic and statistical machinery for inference of evolutionary dynamics and applied it to a large dataset of over 2,000 sequenced mtDNA genomes across eukaryotic life, reconstructing the evolutionary history of mitochondrial genomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are unaware of any existing quantitative approach that identifies the evolutionary pressures behind the highly variable patterns of the presence and absence of mtDNA genes across the whole of the eukaryotic tree of life. Although important progress has been made at a sequence level, Scheel and Hausdorf (2014) take a phylogenetic approach in studying the sequence evolution of mitochondrial ribosomes across a diverse range of taxa), molecular phylogenies are not necessarily the optimal tools to answer broader questions about the evolution of genome structure (Keeling et al, 2005), particularly given the broad range of taxa (and consequent differences in encodings and sequence properties), and the possible parallel evolutionary pathways involved (Adams et al, 2002;Maier et al, 2013). To make progress with this evolutionary problem, we developed highly generalizable stochastic and statistical machinery for inference of evolutionary dynamics and applied it to a large dataset of over 2,000 sequenced mtDNA genomes across eukaryotic life, reconstructing the evolutionary history of mitochondrial genomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as we have shown here, the new OXPHOS subunits in the Metazoa are in general, although part of the membrane arm, not located specifically close to where the deletions in the mitochondrial encoded subunits occurred. There is thus no compelling evidence for the prosthetic hypothesis at the level of complete proteins, in contrast to the level of individual amino acid changes where evidence for co‐evolution has been documented . At the level of protein function, results are more encouraging.…”
Section: Coevolution Of the Mitochondrial Proteome With The Mitochondmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…FcC-G represents an advancement of FASconCAT [ 44 ], an already commonly used tool in phylogenetic studies (e.g. [ 45 - 53 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%