2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2429826
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Evaluation of Intensive Land Use Based on Objective Empowerment by Entropy Method and Neural Network Algorithm

Abstract: In the past, the extreme value standardization of indicators, the traditional weighting method, and the multifactor comprehensive model of land intensive use inevitably linearly correlate the evaluation indicators with the evaluation objects, ignoring the direction differences of different indicators in different intervals. At the same time, these methods are also difficult to meet the change of evaluation index weight value with land use type, and cannot adapt to the actual situation of land use environment l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other pure cultural subjects, the badminton course teaching is very different (Yang et al, 2022). Badminton courses cause the particularity of teaching content, which requires not only theoretical study but also physical practice (Zhao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Current Situation Of Traditional Badminton C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other pure cultural subjects, the badminton course teaching is very different (Yang et al, 2022). Badminton courses cause the particularity of teaching content, which requires not only theoretical study but also physical practice (Zhao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Current Situation Of Traditional Badminton C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%