2021
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic estimation with random forests for discrete‐time survival data

Abstract: Time-varying covariates are often available in survival studies, and estimation of the hazard function needs to be updated as new information becomes available. In this article, we investigate several different easy-to-implement ways that random forests can be used for dynamic estimation of the survival or hazard function from discrete-time survival data. Results from a simulation study indicate that all methods can perform well, and that none dominates the others. In general, situations that are more difficul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In future research the computation of standard errors for the parameters γ or for the hazards λ(t| x i ) directly, for example by bootstrap procedures, needs to be investigated. Moreover, the proposed class of models can be extended to an ensemble method, as survival forests for continuous (Ishwaran et al 2008;Moradian et al 2017;Wang et al 2018) and discrete-time data (Bou-Hamad et al 2011b;Schmid et al 2020;Moradian et al 2021), and adapted to competing risk data, similar to the approach by .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In future research the computation of standard errors for the parameters γ or for the hazards λ(t| x i ) directly, for example by bootstrap procedures, needs to be investigated. Moreover, the proposed class of models can be extended to an ensemble method, as survival forests for continuous (Ishwaran et al 2008;Moradian et al 2017;Wang et al 2018) and discrete-time data (Bou-Hamad et al 2011b;Schmid et al 2020;Moradian et al 2021), and adapted to competing risk data, similar to the approach by .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Tiendrébéogo et al (2019) applied a model-based recursive partitioning approach based on the algorithm by Hothorn et al (2006) to HIV patient data to identify characteristics that are associated with risk of death. For overviews on existing tree-structured methods for discrete-time hazard modeling and extensions for dynamic predictions, see also Kretowska (2019) and Moradian et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches (such as [35] and more recently [32]) designed longitudinal trees that use lagged response values as potential predictors, but still do not treat either the outcome or the covariates as inherently dynamic with time. Overall, in these methods, information is lost during the process, and the number of measurements per subject in real datasets can be too small to obtain satisfying regression parameters.…”
Section: Existing Longitudinal Tree-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 There exist other survival trees and forest methods that can handle time-varying covariate data, but only for discrete-time survival data. [12][13][14][15][16] In this paper, we focus on forest algorithms for dynamic estimation of the survival function for continuous-time survival data. Ensemble methods like forest algorithms are known to preserve low bias while reducing variance and therefore can substantially improve prediction accuracy, compared to tree algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%