1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1575-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Electroretinography in Monochromatic Lights and Fluorescence Electroretinography in Lemurs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since most primate groups except the prosimians have all these anatomical structures, the difference in eye shape parameters among phylogenic groups cannot be explained by the difference in these visual functions. For example, some nocturnal prosimian species are the only primates which lack both cone cell and a fovea in their eyes (Wolin & Massopust, 1970;Alfieri et al, 1976;Webb & Kass, 1976;Debruyn et al, 1980;Castenholtz, 1984). Figure 3 shows the relationship of eye shape parameters with orbital axis angle measured from the cranium (Shigehara, 1996) which reflects the ability of stereoscopic vision.…”
Section: Relationship Between Eye Shape and Visual Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since most primate groups except the prosimians have all these anatomical structures, the difference in eye shape parameters among phylogenic groups cannot be explained by the difference in these visual functions. For example, some nocturnal prosimian species are the only primates which lack both cone cell and a fovea in their eyes (Wolin & Massopust, 1970;Alfieri et al, 1976;Webb & Kass, 1976;Debruyn et al, 1980;Castenholtz, 1984). Figure 3 shows the relationship of eye shape parameters with orbital axis angle measured from the cranium (Shigehara, 1996) which reflects the ability of stereoscopic vision.…”
Section: Relationship Between Eye Shape and Visual Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%