The results are surprising in showing reduced blood flow at the level of the pisiform bone in symptomatic patients compared to asymptomatic controls. This finding is in contrast to 4 studies in the literature documenting consistently increased blood flow at the carpal tunnel inlet. [2][3][4][5] Unfortunately, the authors do not discuss the relevant literature or interpret the differing results. In view of increased vascularity already having been proposed as a biomarker for carpal tunnel syndrome, this factor seems a particularly important point to appropriately discuss. 6 The first study to document and quantitate intraneural blood flow in carpal tunnel syndrome showed significantly increased blood flow (mean, 13.3 cm/s) in hands with highly likely carpal tunnel syndrome. 4 Furthermore, with the increasing clinical likelihood of carpal tunnel syndrome, there was increasing intraneural blood flow velocity, and a significant positive linear correlation was observed between nerve conduction parameters and intraneural blood flow velocity. In 2 studies, increased blood flow was the single most sensitive measure of carpal tunnel syndrome. 4,7 Our own laboratory data in controls show a receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff for intraneural blood flow at less than 7 cm/s. Comparing this value to the average of 3.75 cm/s measured by Evans et al, 1 one does wonder whether there are not factors in play that affected this low reading. In a study by Joy et al, 4 all cases with highly likely carpal tunnel syndrome had recordable blood flow; only 2 were less than 7 cm/s. More than 50% of asymptomatic hands had unrecordable blood flow. 4 In the study by Evans et al, 1 it would be important to know how many patients with and without carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms had unrecordable blood flow? Why did the authors average the peak systolic values, which lowers values as the hand undergoes considerable vasomotion dependent on sympathetic activation? 8 Because pain is a strong sympathetic activator, it would be important to consider the effect of the directly preceding electromyography of the abductor pollices brevis (a painful procedure!) on median nerve blood flow. In a recently published article, we were able to show a significant effect of varying sympathetic activation on median nerve blood flow. 9 We also wonder why the authors included electromyography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, which is not sensitive in its diagnosis or quantification. 10 In our analysis of 60 hands, it was evident that increased blood flow occurs maximally in the carpal tunnel inlet, where it is also easiest to characterize, which makes it difficult to understand why in the study of Evans et al, 1 of the 123 analyzed systolic peaks, most were analyzed in the distal region of the carpal tunnel.The authors are ambiguous about the site of measurement for the proximal carpal tunnel, which once is described at the level of the pisiform and later as the region immediately proximal to the distal edge of the radius. These areas are...