2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey

Abstract: This paper reviews methods for the estimation of dynamic discrete choice structural models and discusses related econometric issues. We consider single agent models, competitive equilibrium models and dynamic games. The methods are illustrated with descriptions of empirical studies which have applied these techniques to problems in different areas of economics. Programming codes for the estimation methods are available in a companion web page.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is popular in the literature on dynamic discrete-choice models (see Aguirregabiria and Mira (2010)) because it delivers a closed-form solution of expectations of future utility conditional on the states and, thus, significantly reduces the computational burden.…”
Section: Assumption 1 the Demand Shocks ε Ijt Are Independently And Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is popular in the literature on dynamic discrete-choice models (see Aguirregabiria and Mira (2010)) because it delivers a closed-form solution of expectations of future utility conditional on the states and, thus, significantly reduces the computational burden.…”
Section: Assumption 1 the Demand Shocks ε Ijt Are Independently And Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many early studies applied binary choice settings; Rust (1996) was the first to apply multinomial choice setting. There exist survey papers on dynamic discrete choice models, such as those proposed by Eckstein and Wolpin (1989), Puterman (1990), Rust (1994), Rust (1996), Aguirregabiria and Mira (2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traveler chooses the next link given the current state in a stochastic process having the Markov property (Rust;1987;2010). In our setting the next state is just the chosen link and it is given with certainty by the action.…”
Section: The Recursive Logit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is the first to provide links between the sequential link based route choice model and the finite multinomial logit model in the context of route choice. Second, we are also the first to provide an interpretation of the model as a dynamic discrete choice model (Rust;1987;2010), connecting the path choice problem to that literature. Third, we are the first to discuss estimation of the model, including by sampling of alternatives 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%