2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic dip testing as a method to assess the condensate drainage behavior from the air-side surface of compact heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Padhmanabhan et al [22] pointed out that removing the water residual at the end of the defrost cycle could only reduce the next frost cycle time by 4%. Zhong et al [23] and Joardar et al [24] pointed out that, compared with hydrophobic coating surfaces, the hydrophilic coating surface was beneficial to water residue, but had no significant effect on water drainage behavior. Liu and Jacobi [25] investigated the differences in condensation and water drainage mechanisms between wind-tunnel experiments and dip tests by using spray or droplet spray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Padhmanabhan et al [22] pointed out that removing the water residual at the end of the defrost cycle could only reduce the next frost cycle time by 4%. Zhong et al [23] and Joardar et al [24] pointed out that, compared with hydrophobic coating surfaces, the hydrophilic coating surface was beneficial to water residue, but had no significant effect on water drainage behavior. Liu and Jacobi [25] investigated the differences in condensation and water drainage mechanisms between wind-tunnel experiments and dip tests by using spray or droplet spray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%