2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnse.2022.3163925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Delayed-Decision Task Assignment Under Spatial-Temporal Constraints in Mobile Crowdsensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, task assignment strategies based on chance patterns usually require prediction of workers' trajectories, and, although different trajectory prediction algorithms [40,41] have been proposed and proven to be effective to some extent, the accuracy cannot be theoretically guaranteed due to complex and unpredictable realistic conditions, which have a significant impact on the final sensing quality of task assignment. Ding et al [42] proposed a dynamic delayed decision user recruitment problem, and designed three algorithms, among which, semi-Markov prediction algorithm and prediction algorithm for meta-paths were used for user selection to maximise user utility, and delayed decision-based task assignment algorithm determined the time point of task assignment and the set of assigned tasks with high task completion rate, budget utilisation and user diversity. Guo et al [43] investigated the multi-task MCS environment by considering two scenarios of whether workers change their movement trajectory to actively engage in perception and proposed the ActiveCrowd task assignment framework, which, for time-sensitive tasks, requires workers to intentionally move to the task location to minimise the total movement distance.…”
Section: Task Allocation Of Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, task assignment strategies based on chance patterns usually require prediction of workers' trajectories, and, although different trajectory prediction algorithms [40,41] have been proposed and proven to be effective to some extent, the accuracy cannot be theoretically guaranteed due to complex and unpredictable realistic conditions, which have a significant impact on the final sensing quality of task assignment. Ding et al [42] proposed a dynamic delayed decision user recruitment problem, and designed three algorithms, among which, semi-Markov prediction algorithm and prediction algorithm for meta-paths were used for user selection to maximise user utility, and delayed decision-based task assignment algorithm determined the time point of task assignment and the set of assigned tasks with high task completion rate, budget utilisation and user diversity. Guo et al [43] investigated the multi-task MCS environment by considering two scenarios of whether workers change their movement trajectory to actively engage in perception and proposed the ActiveCrowd task assignment framework, which, for time-sensitive tasks, requires workers to intentionally move to the task location to minimise the total movement distance.…”
Section: Task Allocation Of Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common challenge of PCS is to achieve optimal task assignment and path planning. Considerable efforts have been devoted to task assignment and path planning mechanisms that rationally assign tasks to users, based on various metrics such as profit [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], space and time [ 15 , 16 , 17 ], and task coverage [ 18 , 19 ]. Despite the considerable body of research devoted to optimizing PCS systems, notable lacunae persist in the domains of task assignment and path planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether a mobile crowdsourcing task can be successfully completed by a worker depends mainly on the worker's spatiotemporal behavior and interest preferences. In addition, worker mobility predictions have a significant impact on task completion rates [21]. In this paper, we propose a mobile crowdsourcing task recommendation method based on analyzing users' historical trajectories and task execution records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%