2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic CT of portal hypertensive gastropathy: significance of transient gastric perfusion defect sign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy was significantly higher in diagnosing PHG in the gastric body (100%) than the fundus (48%) (P = 0.0009). [50] proposed using dynamic CT to diagnose PHG by demonstrating the transient perfusion defect sign, defined as the presence of transient segmental or subsegmental hypo-attenuating mucosa in the gastric fundus or body during hepatic arterial imaging that returns to normal attenuation on portal venous or equilibrium-phase imaging. This sign had a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 88.6%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 72.1% for diagnosing PHG in patients with cirrhosis.…”
Section: Yoo Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy was significantly higher in diagnosing PHG in the gastric body (100%) than the fundus (48%) (P = 0.0009). [50] proposed using dynamic CT to diagnose PHG by demonstrating the transient perfusion defect sign, defined as the presence of transient segmental or subsegmental hypo-attenuating mucosa in the gastric fundus or body during hepatic arterial imaging that returns to normal attenuation on portal venous or equilibrium-phase imaging. This sign had a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 88.6%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 72.1% for diagnosing PHG in patients with cirrhosis.…”
Section: Yoo Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 and 19) has sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 88.6%, respectively. 22 Contrast enhancement of the gastric inner layer in the delayed phase could represent gastric mucosal congestion and when seen in patients with portal hypertension suggests PHG. 23 PHG needs to be differentiated from GAVE syndrome.…”
Section: Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastric endoscopy (D, E) shows a mosaic or snakeskin-like appearance in the fundus and body. Image courtesy: Kim et al22…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of transient segmental or subsegmental hypo-attenuating mucosa in the gastric fundus or body during hepaticarterial imaging that returns to normal attenuation onportal venous called has perfusion defect sign has been described with a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 88.6% for diagnosing PHG in patients with cirrhosis 24 .…”
Section: Dynamic Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%