2019
DOI: 10.25394/pgs.8281850.v1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Coupling in a Model Rocket Combustor

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with experimental results, the unstable combustion frequency is usually overestimated by ≥ 15% (Smith et al, 2010c;Srinivasan et al, 2015), and the amplitude of pressure oscillations is underestimated by up to 40% (Garby et al, 2013). Comparative study of 2D axisymmetric and full 3D numerical simulation of CVRC was conducted by Garby et al (Fuller, 2019) using dynamic thickened flame and LES models. It was reported that the numerical results of full 3D configuration simulation were more consistent with that of experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with experimental results, the unstable combustion frequency is usually overestimated by ≥ 15% (Smith et al, 2010c;Srinivasan et al, 2015), and the amplitude of pressure oscillations is underestimated by up to 40% (Garby et al, 2013). Comparative study of 2D axisymmetric and full 3D numerical simulation of CVRC was conducted by Garby et al (Fuller, 2019) using dynamic thickened flame and LES models. It was reported that the numerical results of full 3D configuration simulation were more consistent with that of experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%