2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12124883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Convergence of Green Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Cities

Abstract: China’s energy consumption in urban areas accounts for a large proportion of total energy consumption, and many pollutants are emitted with the energy consumption. Considering the requirement for green development of economy, it is necessary to study the green total factor productivity (GTFP) in cities. In this study, the Malmquist index, spatial autocorrelation analysis and convergence analysis are used to analyze the GTFP for 263 prefectural or higher-level cities in China. The results show a growing trend o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang Yanan et al (2022) measured the green total factor productivity of the Huaihe Economic Zone from 2004 to 2017 based on the carbon cycle, and used the spatial Durbin model to analyse the effects of seven variables on green total factor productivity, including the level of economic development, environmental regulation, the level of R&D, and the degree of openness to the outside world [ 18 ]. Yuanxin Peng et al (2022) used the Malmquist index, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and convergence analysis to analyse GTFP in 263 prefecture-level and above cities in China [ 19 ]. Zhu Yingyu et al (2022) measured green total factor productivity based on the net carbon sink in China’s plantation sector using a stochastic frontier analysis with output-oriented distance function based on panel data from 30 Chinese firms from 2001 to 2019, and empirically examined the impact of agricultural mechanisation on green total factor productivity [ 20 ].…”
Section: Indicator Construction Data Description and Measurement Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang Yanan et al (2022) measured the green total factor productivity of the Huaihe Economic Zone from 2004 to 2017 based on the carbon cycle, and used the spatial Durbin model to analyse the effects of seven variables on green total factor productivity, including the level of economic development, environmental regulation, the level of R&D, and the degree of openness to the outside world [ 18 ]. Yuanxin Peng et al (2022) used the Malmquist index, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and convergence analysis to analyse GTFP in 263 prefecture-level and above cities in China [ 19 ]. Zhu Yingyu et al (2022) measured green total factor productivity based on the net carbon sink in China’s plantation sector using a stochastic frontier analysis with output-oriented distance function based on panel data from 30 Chinese firms from 2001 to 2019, and empirically examined the impact of agricultural mechanisation on green total factor productivity [ 20 ].…”
Section: Indicator Construction Data Description and Measurement Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng (2020) selected urban sulfur dioxide emissions to represent urban pollutant emissions as a non-desired output indicator, and total urban electricity consumption to represent energy consumption as an input indicator, and applied the Malmquist index model combined with spatial autocorrelation analysis and convergence analysis to measure urban green total factor productivity in China from 2008–2016. Green total factor productivity was found to show a growing tendency during the research phase, decreasing in spatial distribution from the east to the west, and showing relatively strong spatial clustering overall [ 35 ]. Li (2021) adopted industrial sulfur dioxide emissions, industrial wastewater emissions, and industrial flue gas emissions as non-desired outputs to measure green total factor productivity in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration of China from 2005–2018 [ 36 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) GTFP: the method of DEAP-Malmquist index is used to measure the enterprises' environmental efficiency, the industrial GTFP, or agricultural GTFP [42]. Thus, we used the DEAP-Malmquist index to measure GTFP with the input of urban employment, fixed assets, energy consumption, and the output of regional GDP, carbon dioxide emission, and sulfur dioxide emission.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%