2019
DOI: 10.1613/jair.1.11375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Controllability of Controllable Conditional Temporal Problems with Uncertainty

Abstract: Dynamic Controllability (DC) of a Simple Temporal Problem with Uncertainty (STPU) uses a dynamic decision strategy, rather than a fixed schedule, to tackle temporal uncertainty. We extend this concept to the Controllable Conditional Temporal Problem with Uncertainty (CCTPU), which extends the STPU by conditioning temporal constraints on the assignment of controllable discrete variables. We define dynamic controllability of a CCTPU as the existence of a strategy that decides on both the val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not cover PSTN extensions such as PSTNs with choices (Conrad, Shah, & Williams, 2009), conditional PSTNs (Combi, Posenato, Viganò, & Zavatteri, 2019), PSTNs with resource usage (Kumar, Wang, Kumar, Rogers, & Knoblock, 2018). Recent studies, such as that of Cui and Haslum (2019), has focused on controllability checking and computing dynamic decisions (or reliable policies) for dynamically controllable PSTNs, whereas we focus on the DSC or DDC of uncontrollable PSTNs.…”
Section: Landscape Of Ddc/dsc and Utility Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not cover PSTN extensions such as PSTNs with choices (Conrad, Shah, & Williams, 2009), conditional PSTNs (Combi, Posenato, Viganò, & Zavatteri, 2019), PSTNs with resource usage (Kumar, Wang, Kumar, Rogers, & Knoblock, 2018). Recent studies, such as that of Cui and Haslum (2019), has focused on controllability checking and computing dynamic decisions (or reliable policies) for dynamically controllable PSTNs, whereas we focus on the DSC or DDC of uncontrollable PSTNs.…”
Section: Landscape Of Ddc/dsc and Utility Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, a centralized algorithm is proposed (Casanova et al 2016) that computes an optimal decoupling solution for MaSTNU by encoding both the constraints for finding a valid decoupling and the constraints for ensuring dynamic controllability (Cui and Haslum 2017) of the local networks in a single mixed-integer linear program (MILP). However, when privacy is of concern, and the agents do not want to expose the private parts of their local networks, a privacypreserving algorithm is desirable.…”
Section: Distributed Decoupling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a new temporal formalism was proposed. The CCTPU formalism (Cui and Haslum 2017) can model STNUs with duration / edge alternatives, where subnetworks are chosen dynamically during execution. But this high expressivity comes at a price: Its verification algorithms are shown by benchmarks to scale like generate-andtest methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%