2022
DOI: 10.1049/cth2.12264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic control for LNG carrier with output constraints

Abstract: This paper addresses constrained robust control for dynamic positioning of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Carrier in side-by-side offloading operations subject to input time delay. During the LNG offloading operation, the relative motions of the multibody system are connected by the LNG offloading arm. To ensure the operation safety, robust control with asymmetric Barrier Lyapunov Function is proposed considering predefined output constraints under the unknown dynamics and external disturbances. In offshore e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the years of the 1970s of the 20th century, more controllers on optimal theory were proposed and extended later. Later in the 1990s, nonlinear control scheme possibilities for DP began receiving increasing attention; and these include methodologies such as backstepping design, 6 neural network schemes, 7 switching control 8 or sliding mode control (SMC), 9,10 etc. Dynamic control for LNG carriers with output constraints provides a backstepping approach to regulate and optimize the behavior of these specialized vessels during LNG transportation, allowing for safe and efficient operations while considering limitations on key output variables 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the years of the 1970s of the 20th century, more controllers on optimal theory were proposed and extended later. Later in the 1990s, nonlinear control scheme possibilities for DP began receiving increasing attention; and these include methodologies such as backstepping design, 6 neural network schemes, 7 switching control 8 or sliding mode control (SMC), 9,10 etc. Dynamic control for LNG carriers with output constraints provides a backstepping approach to regulate and optimize the behavior of these specialized vessels during LNG transportation, allowing for safe and efficient operations while considering limitations on key output variables 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later in the 1990s, nonlinear control scheme possibilities for DP began receiving increasing attention; and these include methodologies such as backstepping design, 6 neural network schemes, 7 switching control 8 or sliding mode control (SMC), 9,10 etc. Dynamic control for LNG carriers with output constraints provides a backstepping approach to regulate and optimize the behavior of these specialized vessels during LNG transportation, allowing for safe and efficient operations while considering limitations on key output variables 6 . The switching control perspective on the offshore construction scenario of heavy‐lift vessels emphasizes the need for adaptive and robust control strategies that can seamlessly transition between different modes and effectively address the challenges encountered during the no‐load, mooring, and free‐hanging phases 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, the arousing problem is how to complete collision avoidance with partial data in clustered areas. Besides, constrained agents [11][12][13] own the problem of mutual restrictions between the velocity and angular speed, which increases the difficulties in motion control while conducting collision avoidance. In terms of collision avoidance, collaborations among agents are expected in many papers since it is better to realize navigation with predesigned formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%