2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer: Potential to guide treatment? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have been summarized in two systematic reviews published in recent years. 58,59 The most commonly reported pre-treatment DCE parameters with predictive or prognostic value are K trans , followed by V e and V p . Two earlier clinical studies have shown low pre-treatment nodal tumour K trans to be correlated with poor locoregional control and disease-free survival.…”
Section: Functional Mri Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have been summarized in two systematic reviews published in recent years. 58,59 The most commonly reported pre-treatment DCE parameters with predictive or prognostic value are K trans , followed by V e and V p . Two earlier clinical studies have shown low pre-treatment nodal tumour K trans to be correlated with poor locoregional control and disease-free survival.…”
Section: Functional Mri Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is a complex technique for the analysis of microvascular parameters of tissue perfusion [31,32]. It requires the placement of a region of interest within the tumor to calculate time-intensity curves (TIC) and semiquantitative parameters such as the area under the curve (AUC, relative quantity of contrast over time), peak enhancement (maximum concentration of contrast), wash-in (velocity of enhancement), wash-out (velocity of enhancement loss), maximum signal enhancement ratio (SER), and time to maximum enhancement (TME).…”
Section: Vessels and Perfusion: 3d-tof Twist/tricks Angiography Dcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output may vary between and within institutions, because of differences in T1 analysis, methods to measure arterial input function (AIF), choice of ROI, scanner model, pharmacokinetic model and time point chosen during treatment [33]. However, K trans emerged as a marker for tumor hypoxia indicating poorer survival or poorer treatment response and has the potential to be a useful biomarker to guide treatment in head & neck squamous cell cancer [32,34,35]. It may also have the potential to identify early locoregional recurrence and differentiate metastatic lymph nodes from normal nodes [36].…”
Section: Vessels and Perfusion: 3d-tof Twist/tricks Angiography Dcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Administration of external markers of hypoxia also represents an invasive procedure, requiring subsequent biopsy and the acquired information is also very limited in space and time. Less invasive techniques, based on positron emission tomography or nuclear magnetic resonance imaging have signifi cantly lower specifi city and sensitivity (7,8). Thus neither oxygen electrode measurement nor external hypoxia markers can be routinely applied in everyday clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%