2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3496785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Contracting with Flexible Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve for the optimal inspection policy in our model, we explicitly consider 5 Most subsequent work on dynamic contracts analyzes monitoring of current actions; see Antinolfi and Carli (2015); Piskorski and Westerfield (2016); Chen et al (2020); Li and Yang (2020); Dai et al (2022); Rodivilov (2022); Wong (2022). In Halac and Prat (2016) and Dilmé and Garrett (2019), the principal's investment has a persistent effect on her monitoring capabilities, but monitoring still reveals information about current actions only.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve for the optimal inspection policy in our model, we explicitly consider 5 Most subsequent work on dynamic contracts analyzes monitoring of current actions; see Antinolfi and Carli (2015); Piskorski and Westerfield (2016); Chen et al (2020); Li and Yang (2020); Dai et al (2022); Rodivilov (2022); Wong (2022). In Halac and Prat (2016) and Dilmé and Garrett (2019), the principal's investment has a persistent effect on her monitoring capabilities, but monitoring still reveals information about current actions only.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“… For dynamic moral‐hazard problems in which monitoring reveals the current action, see Antinolfi and Carli (2015), Piskorski and Westerfield (2016), Dilmé and Garrett (2019), Chen, Sun, and Xiao (2020), Li and Yang (2020), Dai, Wang, and Yang (2022), Wong (2022). For dynamic adverse‐selection problems in which verification reveals the agent's current information that is independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%