2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic cognitive processes of text-picture integration revealed by event-related potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shan et al found that the relevant brain areas for Chinese semantic processing are the left lower frontal gyrus, the left posterior inferior temporal gyrus, the joint area of the lower parietal lobe, and the superior temporal gyrus [35]. In the study by Song et al, they found that a late positive component was induced in the central, parietal, and temporal regions, which they believed might be related to the semantic activation and integration of text and pictures, respectively [34].…”
Section: E Difference In Brain Response Between Neutral and Phase Random Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shan et al found that the relevant brain areas for Chinese semantic processing are the left lower frontal gyrus, the left posterior inferior temporal gyrus, the joint area of the lower parietal lobe, and the superior temporal gyrus [35]. In the study by Song et al, they found that a late positive component was induced in the central, parietal, and temporal regions, which they believed might be related to the semantic activation and integration of text and pictures, respectively [34].…”
Section: E Difference In Brain Response Between Neutral and Phase Random Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e results of the difference in source response between neutral and phase random stimulus showed that, in the time period between 0.5 s and 1 s, the degree of activation of the occipital, prefrontal, and temporal lobes on the left and right sides of the neutral emotion was greater than that of phase random picture evoked emotion. Song et al studied the difference between text and picture integration process; they found that in the early period of picture processing a larger negative N1 was evoked in the occipital region, and a negative value of N300 was evoked in the prefrontal area, which may reflect the identification process of visual stimuli and the image representation of the picture [34]. After 1.5 s of stimulation, the EEG source response intensities induced by phase random stimulation in the anterior parietal lobe of the left and right hemispheres gradually enhanced and were greater than those of neutral emotion.…”
Section: E Difference In Brain Response Between Neutral and Phase Random Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high temporal resolution of EEG, Event-Related Potentials (ERP) studies can also tell us a lot about the temporal dynamics of the brain activity, particularly by repeatedly presenting conditions time-locked to the stimulus onset. The timing of text-picture integration was explored in ERP and ERD/ERS studies 9 . By plotting the time-frequency of the and channels, Scharinger concluded that EEG is a valid and practical tool to measure mental processing demand 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%