2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.j056660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Characteristics of Separation Shock in an Unstarted Hypersonic Inlet Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More flow conditions are summarised in table 2. An algorithm program for schlieren image quantisation based on the grey level (see Xue, Wang & Cheng 2018) is employed to compute the separation shock angles, and experimental uncertainties are characterised by the standard deviation. The experimental uncertainties are contributed by various factors, e.g.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More flow conditions are summarised in table 2. An algorithm program for schlieren image quantisation based on the grey level (see Xue, Wang & Cheng 2018) is employed to compute the separation shock angles, and experimental uncertainties are characterised by the standard deviation. The experimental uncertainties are contributed by various factors, e.g.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although the separation points experience different positions, the influence of thickness change of boundary layer on SWBLI is small enough to be neglected, according to Grossman & Bruce (2018). An algorithm program for schlieren image quantization based on grey level (see Xue, Wang & Cheng 2018) is employed to detect the shock angles, by which the time history lines of incident shock angle on region A, separation shock angle close to interaction point on region B and separation shock angle close to boundary layer on region C were detected and illustrated in figure 11(). In the following sections, the average value () of angles is used for interaction analyses on shock polar lines, and the error bars are characterized by standard deviation ( STDEV ) such that and .…”
Section: Experiments and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the accuracy, a function to dye the localization is added to the C++ code and once the program runs, the separation shock boundary is marked; thus, the validity of quantization results can be observed directly. The number of the Schlieren images, which are dyed with the wrong boundary, is less than 0.1% [25]. To thoroughly research flow characteristics in time and frequency, and address the strong periodicity of the shock oscillation, WT (Wavelet Transform) analysis was adopted and produced the power spectral density (PSD) contours in Figure 10.…”
Section: Schlieren Image Analysis and Quantization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the accuracy, a function to dye the localization is added to the C++ code and once the program runs, the separation shock boundary is marked; thus, the validity of quantization results can be observed directly. The number of the Schlieren images, which are dyed with the wrong boundary, is less than 0.1% [25]. Figure 11 shows the pressure time history of T1 to T5 (Figure 2) during t = 3.7-4.3 s. T1 first senses the back pressure, and the others lag behind in turn when the shock train moves upstream.…”
Section: Schlieren Image Analysis and Quantization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation