2019
DOI: 10.1177/0142331219880700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic characterisation of pressure transducers using shock tube methods

Abstract: This paper describes the characterisation of the dynamic response of a range of pressure transducer systems. The transducers were subjected to virtually instantaneous pressure step inputs in the National Physical Laboratory’s shock tube facilities. The magnitudes of these pressure steps were derived from ideal gas theory, with prior commissioning tests having been performed to demonstrate the theory’s validity in this application. The results demonstrate a significant variation in response obtained from variou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure change caused by the reflection of the shock wave from the end wall of the driven section can be considered to be an almost ideal step change with a rise time of the order of 1 ns [11]. This makes shock tubes suitable for the calibration of sensors for high-frequency dynamic pressure changes, which are used in a wide range of applications in the aerospace and automotive industries, robotics and production engineering [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Furthermore, it is clear from (1) that the metrological traceability of time-varying pressure is established by measurements of p1, T1 and W determined by the time-of-flight (TOF) method, which makes the shock tube an ideal candidate for a primary high-frequency, time-varying, pressure calibration standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure change caused by the reflection of the shock wave from the end wall of the driven section can be considered to be an almost ideal step change with a rise time of the order of 1 ns [11]. This makes shock tubes suitable for the calibration of sensors for high-frequency dynamic pressure changes, which are used in a wide range of applications in the aerospace and automotive industries, robotics and production engineering [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Furthermore, it is clear from (1) that the metrological traceability of time-varying pressure is established by measurements of p1, T1 and W determined by the time-of-flight (TOF) method, which makes the shock tube an ideal candidate for a primary high-frequency, time-varying, pressure calibration standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the uncertainty of the shock wave velocity represents a major component of the uncertainty of the pressure step has been confirmed also by other authors. In [ 35 ], the uncertainty contribution of the shock wave velocity without considering the uncertainty related to the deceleration of the shock waves was estimated to be approximately 80%, while, in [ 36 ], the same authors estimated the uncertainty contribution of the shock wave velocity, by considering also the uncertainty related to the deceleration of the shock waves, to be approximately 95%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of explosion protection, even the relevant standards [16,17] explicitly say that the specification of measurement uncertainty for the pressure is not required. Measurement uncertainty for other applications of dynamic pressure has been discussed, for instance, for the lowerpressure regime [18,19] like the much shorter pulses observed in shock tubes [20,21]. Such short pulses require an explicit consideration of the dynamics of the sensor and the subsequent measurement chain [2,20,[22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement uncertainty for other applications of dynamic pressure has been discussed, for instance, for the lowerpressure regime [18,19] like the much shorter pulses observed in shock tubes [20,21]. Such short pulses require an explicit consideration of the dynamics of the sensor and the subsequent measurement chain [2,20,[22][23][24][25]. For the type of pulses considered here, there is no need to apply a fully dynamic treatment of measurement uncertainty, because the resonance frequency of the sensors of interest lies well above 10 kHz, much higher than the Fourier frequencies contained in a smooth millisecond pulse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%