2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17412-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic changes in tooth displacement and bone morphometry induced by orthodontic force

Abstract: This study used a novel 3D analysis to longitudinally evaluate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and bone morphometry. Twelve-week-old male Wistar rats were subjected to OTM by applying a constant orthodontic force (OF) of 25cN between one of the upper first molars and a mini-screw. In vivo micro-CTs were taken before and after 10, 17, 24 and 31 days of force application, and superimposed by a novel and rigid voxel-based registration method. Then the tooth and alveolar bone segment at different time points beca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was calculated using a previous split‐mouth study. [ 33 ] A power analysis in the software G*Power 3.1 (Düsseldorf, Germany) suggested a total sample size of minimum 30 animals for ANOVA when assuming 90% power with α = 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sample size was calculated using a previous split‐mouth study. [ 33 ] A power analysis in the software G*Power 3.1 (Düsseldorf, Germany) suggested a total sample size of minimum 30 animals for ANOVA when assuming 90% power with α = 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tooth movement of the maxillary first molar and changes in bone morphometry were evaluated by a rigid voxel‐based registration method as described previously. [ 33,61 ] First, the CT data captured at T1 were superimposed with the corresponding baseline scan at T0 based on the maxillary structures as a reference in MTM Scaffold Strain (KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). Second, the teeth and their surrounding alveolar bone at both T0 and T1 were delineated by the same investigator as a region of interest (ROI) in CTAnalyzer software (version 1.17.5, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Micro-CT reconstruction was analyzed according to established protocols . The brightness and contrast of all images were adjusted through histogram standardization (0.00–0.15) to enhance accuracy and enable automated algorithmic analysis and image comparison . To assess the amount of regenerated bone tissue, the standard distance between the CEJ and ABC between M1 and M2 (defect location) was measured .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 The brightness and contrast of all images were adjusted through histogram standardization (0.00−0.15) to enhance accuracy and enable automated algorithmic analysis and image comparison. 69 To assess the amount of regenerated bone tissue, the standard distance between the CEJ and ABC between M1 and M2 (defect location) was measured. 66 To assess the regenerated bone tissue volume, we measured the percentage of bone tissue in selected areas over four planes spaced by 90 μm along the occlusal/apical direction.…”
Section: Microbiological Biofilm−biomaterials Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%