2019
DOI: 10.1101/762260
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic changes in rhythmic and arrhythmic neural signatures in the subthalamic nucleus induced by anaesthesia and intubation

Abstract: Background: Subcortical structures including the basal ganglia have been proposed to be crucial for arousal, consciousness, and behavioural responsiveness. However, how basal ganglia contributes to the loss and recovery of consciousness during anaesthesia has not been well characterized.Methods: In this study, using local field potentials (LFPs) from subthalamic nucleus (STN) and scalp electroencephalogram in 12 Parkinson's disease patients, we investigate STN neural signatures during propofol general anaes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the value for the aperiodic exponent in the STN we measured is consistent with recent studies that estimated this parameter (Huang et al, 2020;Wiest et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the value for the aperiodic exponent in the STN we measured is consistent with recent studies that estimated this parameter (Huang et al, 2020;Wiest et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the different morphology of cortical versus thalamic and basal ganglia neurons, this could contribute to the difference in 1 𝑓 , ⁄ slope observed. However, the aperiodic slope in the STN has been shown to change with Propofol anesthesia (Huang et al, 2020), dopaminergic medication and DBS treatment (Wiest et al, 2022), demonstrating that this parameter depends on dynamical aspects of neural activity and cannot be fully explained by morphology and cytoarchitecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%