2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic changes in functional gene copy numbers and microbial communities during degradation of pyrene in soils

Abstract: This study investigates the dynamics of pyrene degradation rates, microbial communities, and functional gene copy numbers during the incubation of pyrene-spiked soils. Spiking pyrene to the soil was found to have negligible effects on the bacterial community present. Our results demonstrated that there was a significant difference in nidA gene copy numbers between sampling dates in QZ soil. Mycobacterium 16S rDNA clone libraries showed that more than 90% mycobacteria detected were closely related to fastgrowin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The microbial community changes at sites A1 and A2 were similar to previous reports that xenobiotic pollutants can influence the microbial community significantly Liu et al 2011b). However, the microbial community change at site A3 was quite similar to a previous report showing no obvious difference in the bacterial community between the pyrene-spiked soil and the control (Peng et al 2010). It appears that some potential BDE 209 degradation bacteria may account for that phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The microbial community changes at sites A1 and A2 were similar to previous reports that xenobiotic pollutants can influence the microbial community significantly Liu et al 2011b). However, the microbial community change at site A3 was quite similar to a previous report showing no obvious difference in the bacterial community between the pyrene-spiked soil and the control (Peng et al 2010). It appears that some potential BDE 209 degradation bacteria may account for that phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cluster analysis and phylogenetic analysis of microbial community under BDE 209 stressor In a laboratory-incubated experiment, xenobiotic pollutant concentrations and incubation times were the two key factors to influence the microbial community structure (Zhou et al 2008;Wang et al 2009;Peng et al 2010;Liu et al 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Compared with previous findings (Chen and Ding 2012;Peng et al 2010;Xu et al 2006), pyrene dissipation in both soils was relatively more rapid in this study. It was likely due to the rapid enrichment of activated indigenous degraders in response to the presence of pyrene, which would result in higher pyrene degradation (>96 %) in 1-month incubation (Hamdi et al 2007).…”
Section: Dissipation Of Pyrenecontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This result indicates that there was no significant change in the overall population density of the total bacteria in soils exposed to pyrene. This observation is similar to previous studies showing that 16S rDNA gene copy numbers were not affected by the addition of PAHs including pyrene, phenanthrene, and naphthalene (Park and Crowley 2006;Peng et al 2010;Niepceron et al 2014). However, the relatively constant density for the bacterial biomass did not rule out variations in the species composition of the bacterial community.…”
Section: Enrichment Of Functional Microbes During Pyrene Degradationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Crystalline pyrene (L08162, Alfa Aesar, Lancaster, USA) was dissolved in acetone and uniformly sprayed onto soil to produce sub-samples with pyrene levels of 0 (pyrene-free, with acetone only), 20,50,100,200,400,700,1000,2000 and 5000 mg kg À1 dry weight soil (Brinch et al, 2002;Peng et al, 2010). These subsamples were homogenized by continuous hand shaking in 1000 mL glass bottles and the bottles were closed for 5 min to let the solvent disperse, followed by storage at 25 C in the dark for 16 h. When acetone was evaporated off, sub-samples were mixed with non-spiked soil at the ratio of 1:9 and shaken thoroughly, generating final pyrene levels of 0 (non-spiked control), 2,5,10,20,40,70,100,200 and 500 mg kg À1 dry weight soil (denoted as Pr2, Pr5, Pr10, Pr20, Pr40, Pr70, Pr100, Pr200 and Pr500, respectively).…”
Section: Spiking Of Soil With Pyrenementioning
confidence: 99%