2014
DOI: 10.1520/jte20130256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic CBR Test to Assess the Soil Compaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical parameters and hydraulic conductivity of fly ash depend strictly on the moisture content at compaction (ZabielskaAdamska, 2011;Zabielska-Adamska and Sulewska, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical parameters and hydraulic conductivity of fly ash depend strictly on the moisture content at compaction (ZabielskaAdamska, 2011;Zabielska-Adamska and Sulewska, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBR method is still used as the basic method of pavement design in many countries or even as the recommended method for characterizing subgrades [21]. CBR values are closely connected with the characteristics of compaction, so the CBR test can be used as a method of earth work assessment [7].…”
Section: = 100%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-plastic silty soils behave like pure sands. Soils macroscopically evaluated as non-cohesive and not demonstrating plasticity may however exhibit properties of cohesive soils, with changes occurring not only in strength characteristics but also in deformation and filtration, which was found in the example of fly ash [6][7][8]. The phenomenon of cohesion resistance in non-cohesive soils is the result of suction in the soil, which is often associated with capillary suction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations