2011
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtr049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance

Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm performance. In particular it addresses the question of whether dynamic capabilities impact directly or indirectly on performance. Using data from manufacturing firms, the paper articulates and measures dynamic capabilities as a multi-dimensional construct with three underlying factors: coordination, learning and strategic competitive response. Then, structural equation modelling is employed to explore the relationships among dynami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
346
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(445 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
27
346
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the level of dynamism, there are no observed differences between firms that operate in High and Low dynamic sectors, which confirms the value of IT Capabilities for environments with constant changes as well as stable ones (Protogerou et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As for the level of dynamism, there are no observed differences between firms that operate in High and Low dynamic sectors, which confirms the value of IT Capabilities for environments with constant changes as well as stable ones (Protogerou et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The reason underlying this may be that in contrast to the other two dimensions, integration capability is 'a static concept' (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997: 518) pertaining to linking and combining existing activities and resources. It is more related to integration of different activities with a purpose of encouraging efficiency, such as effective integration and standardization of business processes, and systematic implementation of business planning (Protogerou, Caloghirou, & Lioukas, 2012), which is less likely to affect innovation activities (Abemathy, 1978;Benner & Tushman, 2003). Second and more subtle, while sensing capability has significant impact on technological innovation, it does not affect market innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research for mediating mechanisms is more scarce. The only notable exception is Protogerou, Caloghirou, and Lioukas (2012), who propose and empirically test that a mediating model of dynamic capabilities improve firm performance through operational capabilities. Their study, however, appears tautological in the sense that dynamic capabilities are defined to govern the rate of change of operational capabilities (Winter, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the literature on dynamic and organizational capabilities consists of descriptive studies rather than empirical findings [4,6,[14][15][16][17][18]. The majority of empirical studies are case studies [15,19,20]. Empirical studies that feature more quantitative approaches are still needed to provide more academic rigor to this concept, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%