2013
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1120.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Business Share Allocation in a Supply Chain with Competing Suppliers

Abstract: This paper studies a repeated game between a manufacturer and two competing suppliers with imperfect monitoring. We present a principal-agent model for managing long-term supplier relationships using a unique form of measurement and incentive scheme. We measure a supplier's overall performance with a rating equivalent to its continuation utility (the expected total discounted utility of its future payoffs), and incentivize supplier effort with larger allocations of future business. We obtain the vector of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section III has a detailed comparison. Other contributions include Taylor and Wiggins (1997), who compare competitive and relational supply chains but do not consider dynamics, and Li, Zhang, and Fine (2013), who focus on formal cost-plus contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section III has a detailed comparison. Other contributions include Taylor and Wiggins (1997), who compare competitive and relational supply chains but do not consider dynamics, and Li, Zhang, and Fine (2013), who focus on formal cost-plus contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained the reputation compensation and the cost type displayed by the manufacturer and achieved the goal of weakening the ratchet effect. Li et al [32] studied the multi-stage dynamic coordination of a two-stage supply chain according to the principal-agent theory framework. Under dual information asymmetry, Wang et al [33] designed a dynamic commercial credit incentive contract to motivate the retailer to disclose its true costs, for increasing supply-chain profits.…”
Section: Mechanism Design Under Asymmetric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for sourcing products from potential suppliers, an infinitely repeated game model was developed to solve this issue. Considering manufacturer cannot directly observe the effort of supplier which devoted during their cooperation process, Li et al [ 30 ] emphasized on a long-term relationship between one manufacturer and two suppliers by presenting a repeated game model with an incentive scheme. Tang and Rai [ 31 ] studied the influence of two process capabilities on supplier relationships management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%