2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic behaviour of square tubular T-joints under impact loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the test plan, the accuracies of the FE models were verified using static loading [22] and impact tests [23]. The detailed geometries of the specimens are summarized in Table 1, where b, h, t, and L are the width, height, thickness, and length, respectively; R and r denote the outer and inner corner radii, respectively; and the subscripts "0" and "1" indicate the chord and brace components, respectively.…”
Section: Model Information and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the test plan, the accuracies of the FE models were verified using static loading [22] and impact tests [23]. The detailed geometries of the specimens are summarized in Table 1, where b, h, t, and L are the width, height, thickness, and length, respectively; R and r denote the outer and inner corner radii, respectively; and the subscripts "0" and "1" indicate the chord and brace components, respectively.…”
Section: Model Information and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three static loading specimens (T1-0, T2-0, and T3-0) were used to obtain the static bearing capacities of the specimens and to determine the value of the pre-axial pressure of the brace. The boundary conditions, mesh size, material properties and contact settings between the drop hammer and the joint were kept consistent with the impact specimens [23] in Section 2.…”
Section: Determination Of Specimen Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, researchers have gone from experimental tests in combination with numerical estimations to develop finite element models with some constitutive equations to reproduce the nonlinear visco‐plastic behavior of materials under dynamic loading 33 . Those models, such as Johnson–Cook or Cowper–Symonds, require to identify material parameters, which allows capturing their dynamic mechanical response 34–36 . Because Cowper–Symonds constitutive law is visco‐plastic, it offers the capability to capture the combined effects of strain rate and plastic deformation of the material response under impact testing 34–36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those models, such as Johnson–Cook or Cowper–Symonds, require to identify material parameters, which allows capturing their dynamic mechanical response 34–36 . Because Cowper–Symonds constitutive law is visco‐plastic, it offers the capability to capture the combined effects of strain rate and plastic deformation of the material response under impact testing 34–36 . The parameters values used in constitutive models are usually obtained by uniaxial tension or compression tests at different strain rates or by using inverse methods 33,37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%