2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic behaviors of buried reinforced concrete pipelines with gasketed bell-and-spigot joints subjected to tunnel blasting vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies, the weakest position of the concrete pipeline with bell-and-spigot is at the joints of the pipeline, so the monitoring points of this experiment are arranged with the joints section of the pipeline. 29,30 The vibration velocity of the pipeline in the field was tested by the blasting vibration tester TC-4850. Three vibration velocity-measuring points D1, D2, and D3 were arranged in the internal section of the pipeline.…”
Section: Full-scale Field Test and Monitoring Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to previous studies, the weakest position of the concrete pipeline with bell-and-spigot is at the joints of the pipeline, so the monitoring points of this experiment are arranged with the joints section of the pipeline. 29,30 The vibration velocity of the pipeline in the field was tested by the blasting vibration tester TC-4850. Three vibration velocity-measuring points D1, D2, and D3 were arranged in the internal section of the pipeline.…”
Section: Full-scale Field Test and Monitoring Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic response of buried pipeline under blasting vibration is mainly reflected by vibration velocity, stress and strain, 28 and this experiment mainly considers vibration velocity and strain of the concrete pipeline. According to previous studies, the weakest position of the concrete pipeline with bell‐and‐spigot is at the joints of the pipeline, so the monitoring points of this experiment are arranged with the joints section of the pipeline 29,30 …”
Section: Full‐scale Concrete Pipeline Proximity Blast Field Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ or prototype tests have higher reliability. For example, Yuqing et al [13] conducted prototype tests on the dynamic response characteristics of buried pipes under the action of underground explosions and obtained meaningful data. At present, there are almost no studies in the literature focused on prototype testing to investigate the impact of falling objects on buried pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blasting risks can be controlled and preempted depending on the specifc environmental conditions encountered during construction, ensuring the safety of road clearing operations and reducing the interference with the surrounding environment. Under the same blasting vibration intensities, the lower the main vibration frequency, the closer it is to the selfvibration frequency of the protective object, and the greater the possibility of causing damage to the building (structure) [9,10]. Terefore, by reducing the maximum detonation dosage of a single sound and shortening the delay time, the main vibration frequency can be efectively increased, so as to improve the safety of blasting vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%