2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic atmospheres and winds of cool luminous giants

Abstract: Context. In recent years, high spatial resolution techniques have given valuable insights into the complex atmospheres of AGB stars and their wind-forming regions. They make it possible to trace the dynamics of molecular layers and shock waves, to estimate dust condensation distances, and to obtain information on the chemical composition and size of dust grains close to the star. These are essential constraints for understanding the mass loss mechanism, which presumably involves a combination of atmospheric le… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
160
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
19
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the material to potentially grow in size, and Γ can become larger than 1 only once their size is larger than 0.1-0.3 µm. This idea of a GBDS was recently shown to fit well with the theoretical dynamical wind models of Höfner et al (2016), who allowed for the formation of composite grains with an Al 2 O 3 core and a silicate mantle at slightly larger distances than the Al 2 O 3 GBDS shell, thereby giving the wind a kick start. The location of the GBDS coincides with the region in which large transparent grains are detected in polarized light images (Norris et al 2012;Ohnaka et al 2016), albeit this does not imply by necessity that the species responsible for the Al 2 O 3 emission in the SED are the same species that cause the stellar light to be scattered.…”
Section: Infrared Continuum Emissionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This allows the material to potentially grow in size, and Γ can become larger than 1 only once their size is larger than 0.1-0.3 µm. This idea of a GBDS was recently shown to fit well with the theoretical dynamical wind models of Höfner et al (2016), who allowed for the formation of composite grains with an Al 2 O 3 core and a silicate mantle at slightly larger distances than the Al 2 O 3 GBDS shell, thereby giving the wind a kick start. The location of the GBDS coincides with the region in which large transparent grains are detected in polarized light images (Norris et al 2012;Ohnaka et al 2016), albeit this does not imply by necessity that the species responsible for the Al 2 O 3 emission in the SED are the same species that cause the stellar light to be scattered.…”
Section: Infrared Continuum Emissionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In contrast to the models of Gobrecht et al (2016), Höfner et al (2016) present dynamical models in which the grain growth and the radiation pressure on dust grains are taken into account in a self-consistent manner, but the amount of the seed nuclei for dust formation is treated as a free parameter. They also included the formation of silicate mantle on Al 2 O 3 grains, which was previously proposed by, e.g., Kozasa & Sogawa (1997a, 1997b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion about the nature of the dust found in the extended region. The models of Höfner et al (2016) also suggest that the radiation pressure on Al 2 O 3 grains forming very close to the star is too low to drive mass loss, and Al 2 O 3 grains with silicate mantle forming farther out may be more efficient in driving stellar winds by the scattering of stellar photons. SPHERE-ZIMPOL observations with higher cadence will help us to better understand the dynamics of the dust clouds and clarify where the effective wind acceleration takes place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process creates a region with enhanced gas densities, referred to as warm molecular layer (WML, Tsuji et al 1997). Although models for the dynamical extended atmospheres of AGB stars have advanced significantly in recent years (see, e.g., Bladh et al 2015;Höfner et al 2016, and references therein), our understanding of this complex region is still incomplete, and calculating the mass-loss rate,Ṁ, of AGB stars from first principles is not possible presently. In this context, empirically characterising the properties of the gas from which dust forms is paramount.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%