International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50021-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Assessment of Gifted Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpreting gain scores from pretest to posttest in dynamic assessment methods has been the source of much criticism and concern (Cronbach & Furby, 1970;Embretson, 1987;Grigorenko & Sternberg, 1998;Kanevsky, 2000). These concerns are based on a range of psychometric, methodological, and interpretive issues.…”
Section: Measuring and Reporting Change In Dynamic Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interpreting gain scores from pretest to posttest in dynamic assessment methods has been the source of much criticism and concern (Cronbach & Furby, 1970;Embretson, 1987;Grigorenko & Sternberg, 1998;Kanevsky, 2000). These concerns are based on a range of psychometric, methodological, and interpretive issues.…”
Section: Measuring and Reporting Change In Dynamic Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If we are seeking to identify gifted children it is important that the base instrument does not have a ceiling for these children (Kanevsky, 2000). The RSPM, used at pretest and posttest with the CDA, has a very high ceiling for gifted children of 8 to 11 years of age.…”
Section: A Gifted Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results show that the methodology was successful at identifying children who passed unnoticed through traditional intelligence tests. Kanevsky's (2000) study of pre-school children with an IQ between 110 and 150 demonstrated that gifted children possessed a broader ZPD 1 as well as faster learning capacity and higher generalization from such learning. Moreover, the learning demonstrated by the children was associated with high levels of motivation, meta-cognition, self-regulation and flexibility, a finding which has been confirmed in other studies (Calero, García-Martín, Jiménez, Kazén, & Araque, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For academic acceleration programs and related evaluation studies see Heller and Reimann (2002). Methodological problems of talent search for gifted programs are treated by Hany (1993Hany ( , 1997Hany ( , 2001Hany ( , 2004 and Neber (2004) or-with international perspectivesby Feldhusen and Jarwan (2000), Kanevsky (2000), Sternberg and Grigorenko (2002), and Sternberg and Subotnik (2000).…”
Section: German Gifted Program Activities and Their Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%