2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic and static softening behaviors of aluminum alloys during multistage hot deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[41] The application of any of these methods to the current results is not straightforward, because stress-strain curves exhibit (1) a higher yield stress during initial loading than upon reloading and (2) an increase in the yield stress upon reloading with an increasing interruption time. These characteristics, which oppose conventional behavior reported for steel [31] and aluminum alloys, [32] could be attributable to a combination of experimental error and material flow characteristics. Observation (1) is due to a short transient prior to elastic deformation exhibited in stress-strain curves during initial loading, as shown in Figure 16, which has been previously attributed to friction effects.…”
Section: Fractional Softeningcontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[41] The application of any of these methods to the current results is not straightforward, because stress-strain curves exhibit (1) a higher yield stress during initial loading than upon reloading and (2) an increase in the yield stress upon reloading with an increasing interruption time. These characteristics, which oppose conventional behavior reported for steel [31] and aluminum alloys, [32] could be attributable to a combination of experimental error and material flow characteristics. Observation (1) is due to a short transient prior to elastic deformation exhibited in stress-strain curves during initial loading, as shown in Figure 16, which has been previously attributed to friction effects.…”
Section: Fractional Softeningcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the technique is resource intensive (time and equipment) and requires highly specialized postprocessing routines. Another alternative employed previously for steel [31] and aluminum alloys [32] is the interrupted, or double-hit, compression test. Softening kinetics are determined through the softening observed in the yield strength upon reloading after load interruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow softening is a common characteristic of true stress-true strain curves for many hot deformed alloys. Causes for this can be deformation heating and microstructural instabilities in the material, such as dynamic recrystallization, texture formation, dynamic precipitation, and precipitate dissolution [18]. The peak flow stresses measured for all temperature/strain rate combinations are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.…”
Section: Hot Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Softening mechanisms including static recovery, static recrystallization, and metadynamic recrystallization normally occur during inter-pass periods [25]. The degree of softening depend on the deformation temperature, strain rate, and holding time.…”
Section: Modeling the Kinetics Of Metadynamic Recrystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%