2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijmrs.2018.10017194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of six-axis Stewart platform using flexible joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An RCCS flexural joint [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] is shown in Figure 1 a. The ratio of the minimum cross-sectional diameter t -min of the compliant joint to the maximum cross-sectional diameter t -max is less than or equal to 1/10, and the distance of the joint between ends is 2r.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Compliant Spherical Joint Based On Screw mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RCCS flexural joint [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] is shown in Figure 1 a. The ratio of the minimum cross-sectional diameter t -min of the compliant joint to the maximum cross-sectional diameter t -max is less than or equal to 1/10, and the distance of the joint between ends is 2r.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Compliant Spherical Joint Based On Screw mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it leads to the introduction of bending stresses in the system. Bending can be mitigated by tapering the struts at the ends, or by using flexible hinges [44,45]. However, this design strategy does not allow the fabrication of perfect hinges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%