2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5133266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of non-linear processes in super heavy-lift launch vehicle erector and polyspast lifting system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that for the class of dynamical systems under consideration there is an inequality: m ≤ 3θ, where θ is the number of closed kinematic contours included in the dynamical system. Some examples of the implementation of dynamic analysis for other systems can be found, for example, in [16][17][18]. The formalization of the dynamic model of elastic tree systems in the presence of additional holonomic connections is carried out on the basis of the generalized Newton-Euler formalism and is described in detail in the publication [15].…”
Section: Problem Statement and Remarks On Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that for the class of dynamical systems under consideration there is an inequality: m ≤ 3θ, where θ is the number of closed kinematic contours included in the dynamical system. Some examples of the implementation of dynamic analysis for other systems can be found, for example, in [16][17][18]. The formalization of the dynamic model of elastic tree systems in the presence of additional holonomic connections is carried out on the basis of the generalized Newton-Euler formalism and is described in detail in the publication [15].…”
Section: Problem Statement and Remarks On Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n) are generalized coordinates and the symbols 'r' and 'e' express abbreviations for the words rigid and elastic. Examples of the implementation of dynamic analysis for other systems can be found, for example, in [15][16][17].…”
Section: Traditional Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%