1971
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(71)90029-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of large structures by modal synthesis techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar manner, the weak form for the #apwise motion is derived by multiplying equation (16) by the weighting function w N and then integrating the equation by parts: It is noted that the natural boundary conditions given by equation (18) are satis"ed by the above weak forms. Next, consider the local description of the deformations in an element.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar manner, the weak form for the #apwise motion is derived by multiplying equation (16) by the weighting function w N and then integrating the equation by parts: It is noted that the natural boundary conditions given by equation (18) are satis"ed by the above weak forms. Next, consider the local description of the deformations in an element.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modelling method employs the Cartesian deformation variables and the linear Cauchy strain measures. It has several merits such as simplicity of formulation, ease of implementation in "nite elements methods, and e$ciency of computation which results from the use of co-ordinate reduction techniques [16,17]. This modelling method, however, often provides erroneous results when structures undergo overall motion such as rotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modelling method has several merits such as simplicity of formulation, ease of implementation in "nite element methods, and availability of the co-ordinate reduction technique [4], which enables one to save enormous computation time for the dynamic analysis of structures. However, this modelling method often provides erroneous dynamic analysis results for the structures undergoing overall motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18). One is size optimization of the initial model that has 7,350 solid elements and 2,450 shell elements.…”
Section: Example For Verification Of the Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the construction methods of the superelements use the Guyan reduction, the generalized dynamic reduction (GDR) and the component mode synthesis (CMS) method [14,15]. In this study, the component mode synthesis (CMS) method, which was proposed by Hurty in 1960, is used [16][17][18]. The CMS method is an effective method for dynamic analysis with very large and/or complex structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%