2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2015.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Analysis of AP1000 Shield Building Considering Fluid and Structure Interaction Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the third generation of nuclear power technology booming in the United States and China, 1,2 such as AP1000 3,4 and CAP1400, 5 reliabilities and motion performances of related electromechanical equipment should be improved. 6,7 At present, CAP1400 is one of the maximum nuclear power technologies under the research and development, 8,9 and only the construction cost of a CAP1400 nuclear power plant can be more than billions of dollars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the third generation of nuclear power technology booming in the United States and China, 1,2 such as AP1000 3,4 and CAP1400, 5 reliabilities and motion performances of related electromechanical equipment should be improved. 6,7 At present, CAP1400 is one of the maximum nuclear power technologies under the research and development, 8,9 and only the construction cost of a CAP1400 nuclear power plant can be more than billions of dollars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sener et al [12] developed a 3D nonlinear inelastic finite element model and then incorporated it into the finite element software ABAQUS for studying the seismic behavior of a pressurized water reactor containment internal structure. Based on the finite element method, Xu et al [13] investigated the effects of water level in a water tank on the dynamic response of the AP1000 shield building subjected to three-dimensional ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies (e.g., Satoh Onitsuka, Goto, Iijima and Ojima, Mechanical Engineering Journal, Vol.4, No.3 (2017) [DOI: 10.1299/mej. et al, 2010; Xu et al, 2016) used 3D FEM for structural modeling with precise fluid modeling methods (e.g., finite volume method and particle method), which can capture complicated fluid phenomena such as splashing and turbulence. However, as mentioned in the study of Rydell et al (2013), these fluid modeling methods require much computational time even in present-day commercial computers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%