The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2019
DOI: 10.1590/s1983-41952019000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of a concrete chimney considering the aerodynamic damping

Abstract: Usually, the analysis of structures under wind loading is performed using an equivalent static analysis, where the influence of floating response is taken into account by the gust factor. This methodology can be used in case of rigid structures for not presenting a considerable dynamic response. More flexible structures, in particular those lightly damped, may show an important resonant response and their dynamic properties must be considered in the analysis. The aim of this paper is to present a methodology f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The building is made of reinforced concrete elements and presents a modulus of elasticity equal to 32 GPa (E = 32 GPa), Poisson's ratio of 0.2 (Ξ½ = 0.2), specific weight equal to 25 kN/m 3 (ρ = 25 kN/m 3 ) and damping ratio of 0.02 (ΞΎ = 2% [5]). On the other hand, the aerodynamic damping effect [12] was not considered, due to the high computational cost and the minimum impact on the results [13]. It is worth highlighting that the building structural model attends all requirements related to the ultimate and serviceability limit states recommended by the Brazilian design standard NBR 6118 [14].…”
Section: Investigated Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The building is made of reinforced concrete elements and presents a modulus of elasticity equal to 32 GPa (E = 32 GPa), Poisson's ratio of 0.2 (Ξ½ = 0.2), specific weight equal to 25 kN/m 3 (ρ = 25 kN/m 3 ) and damping ratio of 0.02 (ΞΎ = 2% [5]). On the other hand, the aerodynamic damping effect [12] was not considered, due to the high computational cost and the minimum impact on the results [13]. It is worth highlighting that the building structural model attends all requirements related to the ultimate and serviceability limit states recommended by the Brazilian design standard NBR 6118 [14].…”
Section: Investigated Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝑉𝑉 οΏ½( 𝑧𝑧, 𝑑𝑑) = βˆ‘ οΏ½ 2𝑆𝑆 𝑣𝑣 (𝑓𝑓 𝑖𝑖 )βˆ†π‘“π‘“ 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐(2πœ‹πœ‹π‘“π‘“ 𝑖𝑖 𝑑𝑑 + πœƒπœƒ 𝑖𝑖 ) 𝑁𝑁 𝑖𝑖=1 (12) The fluctuating part of the wind velocity V οΏ½ (t) is generated with random phase angles, and the amplitude of each harmonic is calculated based on the spectral density determined using the Kaimal spectrum [Equation 13], where fS(f) corresponds to the spectral density associated with the longitudinal component of the turbulence with frequency f. The term X is the dimensionless frequency and can be represented by Equation 14, and the term u * is the friction velocity, represented by Equation 15, where V οΏ½ (Z) is the static part of the wind velocity at height Z, and K is the Karman constant. It should be emphasised that, according to the Kaimal power density spectrum, the building fundamental frequency determined by the modal analysis (see section 4) is in the range of higher energy transfer peaks associated with low natural frequencies (see Figure 13).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling Of the Wind Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). A damping ratio ΞΎ of 0.01 is considered for the first two mode frequencies of the concrete cylinder [26]. The damping of the liners is ignored due to their low value and on the safe side.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%