2007
DOI: 10.1243/09544062jmes543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of a cabinet of a reactor protection system

Abstract: The responses of a cabinet for a reactor protection system under seismic loadings are analysed by using the finite-element method, and its dynamic characteristics are evaluated. Analysed modes are compared with the measured data from a resonance search test. The structural safety of the cabinet is evaluated considering the required response spectrums of the operation-base and safe-shutdown earthquakes. The transient response of the cabinet is analysed by utilizing the measured acceleration of the vibration tab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed finite element analysis is also useful associated with micro vibration in-situ measurement verification. However, a practical and cost-effective evaluation method for incabinet equipment is needed considering that both testing and finite element analysis are complex and costly [4][5][6]. In this study, Three typical types of MCCs in the nuclear power plant with specified shelve spacing of 300 mm, 450 mm and 600 mm in height were experimentally studied though shaking table tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed finite element analysis is also useful associated with micro vibration in-situ measurement verification. However, a practical and cost-effective evaluation method for incabinet equipment is needed considering that both testing and finite element analysis are complex and costly [4][5][6]. In this study, Three typical types of MCCs in the nuclear power plant with specified shelve spacing of 300 mm, 450 mm and 600 mm in height were experimentally studied though shaking table tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%