2007
DOI: 10.1177/1359105307076229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

`Dying Twice'

Abstract: We highlight the complex interplay of psychological and social factors driving AIDS stigma, drawing on a study of community responses to HIV/AIDS in two communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We draw on 120 semi-structured interviews and focus groups, in which open-ended topic guides were used to explore community responses to HIV/AIDS. Drivers of stigma included fear; the availability and relevance of AIDS-related information; the lack of social spaces to engage in dialogue about HIV/AIDS; the link betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors (Campbell & Deacon, 2006;Campbell et al, 2007) have advocated multilevel interventions to address AIDS stigma. Campbell and colleagues (2007) Qualitative Health Research 20(11) stressed the importance of complementary "top-down" and "bottom-up" interventions to address AIDS stigma, and the provision of "social space" for communities to critically examine issues related to HIV and AIDS.…”
Section: Implications For Practice Policy and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several authors (Campbell & Deacon, 2006;Campbell et al, 2007) have advocated multilevel interventions to address AIDS stigma. Campbell and colleagues (2007) Qualitative Health Research 20(11) stressed the importance of complementary "top-down" and "bottom-up" interventions to address AIDS stigma, and the provision of "social space" for communities to critically examine issues related to HIV and AIDS.…”
Section: Implications For Practice Policy and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, poverty might magnify and drive the stigmatization of persons living with HIV and AIDS (Campbell, Nair, Maimane, & Nicholson, 2007;Masanjala, 2007), limiting one's ability to resist stigma (Campbell & Deacon, 2006). The phenomenon of layered stigma suggests that stigma might follow the path of existing fault lines (Campbell & Deacon); however, it might also create new ones (Deacon, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of articles, however, also examine it in terms of symbolic stigma (Campbell, Foulis, Maimane, & Nicholson, 2007;Campbell, Foulis, Maimane, & Sibiya, 2005;Goudge, Ngoma, Manderson, & Schneider, 2009;Reidpath et al, 2005); stigma arising from valuebased ideology that imposes moral judgments on others (Herek, 2002). Symbolic resources, in resourcescarce settings, represent valuable social currency such as respect, trust, and social capital (Campbell et al, 2005(Campbell et al, , 2011Goudge et al, 2009;Reidpath et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Symbolic resources, in resourcescarce settings, represent valuable social currency such as respect, trust, and social capital (Campbell et al, 2005(Campbell et al, , 2011Goudge et al, 2009;Reidpath et al, 2005). Resource-based stigma thus can be viewed as a social competition for power in which stigmatizers use it as a mechanism to limit the flow of symbolic resources thereby improving their social standing vis-a`-vis the stigmatized (Campbell et al, 2005(Campbell et al, , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such results can be easily correlated with variables such as gender, age, or religion, their value as predictors of the damage actually done by stigma, as experienced by the bearers of that stigma, is unclear. Examples of such research on stigma in highprevalence African communities include [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. These authors variously conclude that stigma is multidimensional, that stigmatizing attitudes and beliefs are unevenly distributed within populations, and that shame, blame and aversion are the most common expressions of stigma.…”
Section: Stigma Remains the Single Most Important Barrier To Public Amentioning
confidence: 99%