Dying for a Meal: An Integrative Review of Characteristics of Choking Incidents and Recommendations to Prevent Fatal and Nonfatal Choking Across Populations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to conduct an integrative review of original research, across adult populations relating to fatal or nonfatal choking on food, to understand ways to respond to and prevent choking incidents. Method Four scientific databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were searched for original peer-reviewed research relating to fatal or nonfatal choking on foods. Data were extracted on study characteristics; factors leading up to, events at the time of, and actions taken after the choking incident; and impacts of choking incidents. An integrative review of the findings across studies identified several risk factors and recommendations to reduce the risk of choking. Results In total, 52 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review, of which 31 were quantitative, 17 were qualitative, and 4 were of a mixed methods design. Studies reported the observations and narratives of bystanders or researchers, or else were large-scale autopsy studies, and included both the general public and people at risk of dysphagia. A range of food types were involved, and several actions were reported in response to food choking. Strategies to reduce the risk of choking were identified in the studies and are presented in 5 main categories. Conclusions Factors leading up to choking incidents extend well beyond the individual to the environment for mealtimes; the provision of appropriate mealtime assistance and oral care; and regular monitoring of general health, oral health, and medications. Bystanders' increased awareness and knowledge of how to respond to choking are vital. The results of this review could be used to inform service policy and training, for individuals at risk of choking, the people who support them, and the general public. Further research is needed to explore choking prevention and airway protection in individuals with dysphagia. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8121131

‘This is your golden time. You enjoy it and you’ve plenty time for crying after’: How dysphagia impacts family caregivers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – A qualitative study

“…A recent integrative review of the research related to choking on food in adults identified that choking is associated with trauma and fear. 66 Interestingly, previous research on the experience of choking from the perspective of people with ALS concluded that only 27% of them perceived choking as moderately severely distressing whereas 73% perceived mild or no distress. 67 Caregivers’ fear of choking strongly emerged in our study and this may suggest that the caregivers experience more distress related to choking than the person with ALS.…”

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support

“…Factors which place individuals at risk of FBAO include psychotropic medication, alcohol intoxication, neurological conditions producing reduced swallowing and cough reflexes, mental impairment, developmental disability, dementia, poor dentition and older age. 138,139 Foreign bodies most commonly associated with airway obstruction are solids such as nuts, grapes, seeds, vegetables, meat and bread. 137,138 Children, in particular, may put all sorts of objects in their mouths.…”

Evaluation of DeChoker, an Airway Clearance Device (ACD) Used in Adult Choking Emergencies Within the Adult Care Home Sector: A Mixed Methods Case Study

“…The death rate associated with choking is significantly and positively associated with aging (see Figure 1) have also reported choking as the second highest preventable cause of death in this cohort (1,5,6). This is due to several factors including, physiological changes to the body's musculature, poor dentition, dementia and other neurological comorbidities, which combined are estimated to increase the risk of choking sevenfold in people over the age of 65 (7,8). Another significant characteristic of choking is the high percentage of incidences caused by soft foods relative to large solid pieces, in contrast to younger populations (9).…”