2017
DOI: 10.1115/1.4036410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dye Visualization of In-Line Twin Synthetic Jets in Crossflows—A Parametric Study

Abstract: This paper presents a parametric study on the interaction of twin circular synthetic jets (SJs) that are in line with a crossflow over a flat plate. The resulting vortex structures under different actuation, and flow conditions are investigated using two-plane dye visualization in a water tunnel. The influence of four independent nondimensional parameters, i.e., the Reynolds number (ReL), Strouhal number (St), velocity ratio (VR), and phase difference (Δϕ), on the behavior of the twin SJs is studied. It is fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also seen that at ∆φ = 3π/2 (Figure 7d), unlike its counterpart, the head of the SJ issued from the upstream actuator is not affected at all by the near-wall particles. All these observations support our previous statement, i.e., in any case, the SJ issued from the up-stream actuator can better maintain its vortical structure than the SJ issued from the downstream actuator [23,24], and hence it dominates the interaction. The reason is obvious: the vortex produced by the upstream actuator has sufficient time to develop itself before the interaction, while the SJ issued from the downstream actuator is disturbed from the very beginning of its emergence.…”
Section: Impact Of Phase Differencessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is also seen that at ∆φ = 3π/2 (Figure 7d), unlike its counterpart, the head of the SJ issued from the upstream actuator is not affected at all by the near-wall particles. All these observations support our previous statement, i.e., in any case, the SJ issued from the up-stream actuator can better maintain its vortical structure than the SJ issued from the downstream actuator [23,24], and hence it dominates the interaction. The reason is obvious: the vortex produced by the upstream actuator has sufficient time to develop itself before the interaction, while the SJ issued from the downstream actuator is disturbed from the very beginning of its emergence.…”
Section: Impact Of Phase Differencessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At ∆φ = 0 (Figure 7a) and π (Figure 7c), the legs of one hairpin vortex are entrained into the head of the other, forming partially interacting vortex structures. As such, the twin SJs have distinct vortex strengths at various phase differences, as revealed in the authors' previous PIV experiments [23,24]. Furthermore, it is seen that, no matter which type of interaction occurs, the green particles issued from the downstream actuator are mainly scattered in the outer layer of the interacting structures, whereas the red particles is-sued from the upstream actuator are mainly enclosed inside.…”
Section: Impact Of Phase Differencessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations