2015
DOI: 10.1145/2766972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic T-mesh subdivision

Abstract: Meshes with T-joints (T-meshes) and related high-order surfaces have many advantages in situations where flexible local refinement is needed. At the same time, designing subdivision rules and bases for T-meshes is much more difficult, and fewer options are available. For common geometric modeling tasks it is desirable to retain the simplicity and flexibility of commonly used subdivision surfaces, and extend them to handle T-meshes.We propose a subdivision scheme extending Catmull-Clark and NURSS to a special c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common approach to define a non‐uniform subdivision scheme is to use a heuristic way to generalize non‐uniform bi‐cubic B‐spline refinement rules to arbitrary valences, such as [SZSS98, KBZ15]. However, the subdivision matrices by these approaches cannot ensure the second and third eigenvalues to be identical, which is the necessary condition for the surface to be G 1 [PR08].…”
Section: Eigen‐polyhedramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One common approach to define a non‐uniform subdivision scheme is to use a heuristic way to generalize non‐uniform bi‐cubic B‐spline refinement rules to arbitrary valences, such as [SZSS98, KBZ15]. However, the subdivision matrices by these approaches cannot ensure the second and third eigenvalues to be identical, which is the necessary condition for the surface to be G 1 [PR08].…”
Section: Eigen‐polyhedramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, [SZSS98] introduced the first NURBS‐compatible non‐uniform subdivision scheme. And later this scheme was improved by many researchers [MRF06, Urs09, MFR*10, KBZ15, LFS16]. In order to create non‐uniform sharp features, a general approach is to set some knot intervals to be zeros [SZSS98, KSD14b, ZML15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this aspect for prominent use cases of quad layouts is well known [LRL06, ACSD*03, CSAD04, CIE*16]. Depending on the application, it serves maximizing surface approximation quality [D'A00], minimizing normal noise and aliasing artefacts [BK01], optimizing element planarity [LXW*11] or achieving smooth curvature distribution (due to their tensor‐product nature common spline surface representations are prone to ripples (curvature oscillations) if aligned badly [KBZ15]). Besides, principal direction alignment can also be of interest for aesthetic reasons.…”
Section: Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct a global parametric spline mesh for arbitrary topology, the local refinement of T-splines was investigated in Sederberg et al (2004), Scott et al (2012). Kovacs et al (2015), Campen and Zorin (2017) presented efficient algorithms for building discrete conformal similarity maps and developed an algorithm to build a global T-mesh. Ying et al (2006) developed the manifold T-spline, using global conformal parameterizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%