2019
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic effects of distress on sleep duration in advanced cancer patients and spouse caregivers

Abstract: Objective Short sleep duration is a common problem for both advanced cancer patients and their spouse caregivers. Sleep and distress have been shown to be interdependent in patient‐caregiver and spouse dyads, yet virtually, no work has explored the dyadic effects of psychological distress on sleep in advanced cancer patients and spouse caregivers. The goal of the present study was to examine the dyadic impact of anxiety and depression on sleep duration in a sample of advanced cancer patients and their spouse c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients' pain 10 and symptom severity 48,49 were associated with caregivers' depression, 10,48,49 anxiety, 48 or distress 50 . Patients' sleep duration was affected by caregivers' anxiety 42 . Caregivers' psychological morbidity appeared to be directly related to patients' physical morbidity, 5,47 and (in one case) predicted patients' physical health decline 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Patients' pain 10 and symptom severity 48,49 were associated with caregivers' depression, 10,48,49 anxiety, 48 or distress 50 . Patients' sleep duration was affected by caregivers' anxiety 42 . Caregivers' psychological morbidity appeared to be directly related to patients' physical morbidity, 5,47 and (in one case) predicted patients' physical health decline 39 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies 37‐40 (17.4%) included patients with various cancer types, whereas 19 (82.6%) studies narrowed their sample by recruiting patients with either a specific cancer type 5,10,30‐36,41,43‐47,49,50 or in one case, a few specific types 42 . There were 12 cross‐sectional observational, 5,10,30,32,34,35,39‐42,44‐46,48 6 longitudinal, 5,31,36,39,43,49 2 mixed methods, 30,47 2 qualitative, 33,40 and 1 retrospective study 50 . Fifteen studies (65.2%) were conducted in the United States, 5,10,30,32‐34,39‐47 while 8 (34.8%) were international.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations