2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DXA-derived hip shape is related to osteoarthritis: findings from in the MrOS cohort

Abstract: SummaryObjectiveStatistical shape modelling (SSM) of radiographs has been used to explore relationships between altered joint shape and hip osteoarthritis (OA). We aimed to apply SSM to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans, and examine associations between resultant hip shape modes (HSMs), radiographic hip OA (RHOA), and hip pain, in a large population based cohort.MethodSSM was performed on baseline hip DXA scans from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Associations between the top ten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although direct comparison of individual modes and scores cannot be made across cohorts, the magnitude of these differences is similar to that seen between healthy and clinical populations. For example, in a recent study using a similar SSM design, differences between cases and controls in hip shape modes associated with hip fracture were 0.21 for HM2 and 0.26 for HM4, whereas case‐control group differences in five hip shape modes associated with hip OA were 0.21 (HSM1), 0.31 (HSM3), 0.2 (HSM4), 0.24 (HSM8), and 0.19 (HSM10) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although direct comparison of individual modes and scores cannot be made across cohorts, the magnitude of these differences is similar to that seen between healthy and clinical populations. For example, in a recent study using a similar SSM design, differences between cases and controls in hip shape modes associated with hip fracture were 0.21 for HM2 and 0.26 for HM4, whereas case‐control group differences in five hip shape modes associated with hip OA were 0.21 (HSM1), 0.31 (HSM3), 0.2 (HSM4), 0.24 (HSM8), and 0.19 (HSM10) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is both a strength and a weakness of the method. Its strength is that it can detect and isolate coordinated changes so that certain modes become indicative of pathology and can be used as imaging biomarkers . The weakness, demonstrated here, is that the overall difference in shapes between early and late walkers, using all the modes in combination, is subtle, as indicated by the superimposed shapes in Fig .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1.78 pixels, respectively. A cut off median point-to point difference of less than or equal to 3 was previously considered as accurate 7 . Whilst the initial model was based on a 58-point model, this was subsequently modified to a 53-point model due to high variability in points placed at the acetabular overhang and medial and lateral femoral shaft, in both adolescent and adult SSM templates.…”
Section: Statistical Shape Model (Ssm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-(within-) and inter-observer (between-observer) repeatability of manual point placement was measured as the difference in pixels between coordinates of 58 points. The intra-and inter-observer reliability assessed by mean point-to-point repeatability was 1.22 and published literature [7][8][9] the first 10 modes, which together explain 86% of variance in the adult SSM, were selected. Figure 2 and Figure 3 provide graphical representation and Table 4 provides summary of the features described by each HSM.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Point Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%