Düzce yöresinde münavebeli otlatmanın bazı toprak özellikleri üzerine etkisi

Özcan, Mehmet Musa

doi:10.17099/jffiu.79331

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies have reported that the grazing can increase BD [32] [34] [51] [52], which results in soil compaction, negatively affecting soil water and crop growth. Therefore, the balance of the soil compaction from the grazing and the effects of the compaction on soil water and crop growth is a key aspect of the land management [53].…”

Section: Soil Bulk Density (Bd) and Water Infiltration Rate (Q S )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Demonstrating Short-Term Impacts of Grazing and Cover Crops on Soil Health and Economic Benefits in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System in South Dakota

Tobin¹,

Singh²,

Kumar³

et al. 2020

OJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) is an alternative that can help in intensifying food production while benefiting the environment. However, the assessments of the impacts of ICLS on the soil and economic benefits relative to specific environments in South Dakota are still lacking. This study was to assess the effects of ICLS on soil health and economic benefits under a corn (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max L.)-rye (Secale cereale L.) rotation in South Dakota. Cover crops blends were planted after the rye crop, and grazing treatments (with and without) were applied after the cover crops establishment in 2015-2016. Data from this study indicate that most soil properties are not negatively impacted by grazing. However, the grazing increased soil bulk density (BD) and decreased soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil water retention (SWR) compared with the ungrazing. The effect of grazing on corn yield was not significant. The cover crops did not impact the pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total nitrogen (TN), β-glucosidase, acid hydrolysis carbon fraction, microbial biomass carbon, and SWR, but impacted the SOC, hot/cold water carbon fraction, BD, infiltration rate (q s) in some phases and depths. The effects of different cover crop blends on corn yield were not as strong. The economic analysis showed that implementing ICLS

show abstract

Section: Soil Bulk Density (Bd) and Water Infiltration Rate (Q S )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Demonstrating Short-Term Impacts of Grazing and Cover Crops on Soil Health and Economic Benefits in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System in South Dakota

Tobin¹,

Singh²,

Kumar³

et al. 2020

OJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Seksoncu ortasının mevcuduna bakıldığında bu orta 1623 senesinde 350 kişiyken 1664 yılında 531 kişiydi 20 . Seksoncuların sayısı 18. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında 200 kişi civarındaydı 21 . 16. yüzyılın sonlarında seksoncu ortasına günlük kırk altı, sekiz nefer seksoncu bölükbaşısına sekizer, seksoncu kethüdasına ise dört çift fodula veriliyordu.…”

Section: Seksoncu Ortasının Kuruluşu Gelişimi Ve İlgasıunclassified

Yeniçeri Ocağının Yetmiş Birinci Ortası: Seksoncular (Samsoncular)

Alti

2020

Journal of History and Future

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Linking ecosystem service benefit and grazing prohibition intensity can better optimize fence layout in northern Tibet

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is an urgent need to link grazing exclusion policy and the resulting benefits for fence layout management. However, policy implementation intensity and benefits are rarely considered together. Here, combining the changes in the rate of the livestock and fenced area, we constructed a grazing prohibition intensity (GPI) index that reflected the intensity of policy implementation. We also quantified ecosystem service benefits (ESBs), including net primary productivity (NPP) and soil conservation by the different models. Then, a new perspective in combination with ESBs and GPI was used to assess whether a fence layout is appropriate using the four–quadrant model and how to optimize a potentially unreasonable fence layout based on seven drivers. We found that the NPP and soil conservation service notably increased by 59% and 87%, respectively, in the total fenced area, after the implementation of the grazing exclusion program. The high values of ESBs and GPI were concentrated in the eastern and central‐eastern regions of the northern Tibet, respectively. Moreover, the potentially unreasonable fence layout accounted for 10% of the total fenced area, and was focused on meadow areas with a high human footprint. The area proportion of reasonable fence layout coupling ESBs and GPI increased by 20% compared with ESBs individually. Finally, an optimal potential unreasonable fence layout might reduce the mismatch between the ESB and GPI by considering countermeasures such as attention to the potential unreasonable fence layout, setting a target for supplying carbon sinks and soil and water conservation quantities and reducing the human footprint. Our study indicates the necessity of linking ESBs and GPI for fence layout management.

show abstract

Düzce yöresinde münavebeli otlatmanın bazı toprak özellikleri üzerine etkisi

Cited by 4 publications

References 14 publications

Demonstrating Short-Term Impacts of Grazing and Cover Crops on Soil Health and Economic Benefits in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System in South Dakota

Demonstrating Short-Term Impacts of Grazing and Cover Crops on Soil Health and Economic Benefits in an Integrated Crop-Livestock System in South Dakota

Yeniçeri Ocağının Yetmiş Birinci Ortası: Seksoncular (Samsoncular)

Linking ecosystem service benefit and grazing prohibition intensity can better optimize fence layout in northern Tibet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About