Livestock Environment VIII, 31 August - 4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, Brazil 2008
DOI: 10.13031/2013.25490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dust Reduction in Broiler Houses by Spraying Rapeseed Oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reductions found in the present study agree reasonably well with the values that can be calculated by fitting the oil application rates in the aforementioned equation, namely 53% for 8 mL m -2 d -1 and 70% for 16 mL m -2 d -1 . Aarnink et al (2011) found no relationship between oil application rate and PM 2.5 reduction. At 6 mL m -2 d -1 , PM 2.5 emission was already reduced by 84%, and this level did not increase further at higher application rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reductions found in the present study agree reasonably well with the values that can be calculated by fitting the oil application rates in the aforementioned equation, namely 53% for 8 mL m -2 d -1 and 70% for 16 mL m -2 d -1 . Aarnink et al (2011) found no relationship between oil application rate and PM 2.5 reduction. At 6 mL m -2 d -1 , PM 2.5 emission was already reduced by 84%, and this level did not increase further at higher application rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Aarnink et al (2011) found a relationship between these two parameters described by the equation y = -0.021x + 0.64 (R 2 = 0.69), where y is the PM 10 emission relative to the control treatment (0 to 1), and x the oil application rate (mL m -2 d -1 ). The reductions found in the present study agree reasonably well with the values that can be calculated by fitting the oil application rates in the aforementioned equation, namely 53% for 8 mL m -2 d -1 and 70% for 16 mL m -2 d -1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Manure and feed are regarded as the main sources of PM in the pig house (Cambra-López et al, 2011) so twice a day manure removal shortens the retention time of manure in the pig house, thereby substantially reducing the PM produced from manure. In addition, fogging, spraying or sprinkling clean water may reduce the concentration of dust in the air (Takai and Pedersen, 2000;Aarnink et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2014). Therefore, the lower PM concentrations inside pig houses operated with the "cleaning the manure dry" manure removal system are expected and reasonable.…”
Section: Pm Concentrations and Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%